• TechyDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always wondered how people thought the “good guy with a gun” would work in a chaotic real world situation. Suppose you’re armed and there’s a mass shooting event. You pull out your gun and keep a look out for the shooter as you hear gunfire getting closer. Then you spot a guy holding a gun. You quickly take aim and fire…

    … And hit another “good guy with a gun” who was trying to take out the mass shooter the same as you.

    Oh, but then you get shot by a third “good guy with a gun” who thought YOU were the mass shooter.

    Arming everyone and telling them to be “good guys with guns” just seems, at best, like it would lead to MORE injuries and deaths.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s deflective rhetoric so they don’t have to address the truth:

      We don’t know who is going to make a bad decision with their gun until after they do it.

    • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, my coworkers said how great it would have been after the Colorado movie theater shooting (Batman movie) if everyone was armed. They just knew the original shooter would have been killed right away.

      So,

      1. Dark theater
      2. Smoke filled (by shooter)
      3. Bullets suddenly flying

      Who in their right mind thinks basically everyone wouldn’t have been mowed down in a hail of gun fire?

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s either that, or the people with guns are afraid to use them when the time comes and they hesitate too long to do any good.