Red indicates a higher average temperature than the previous year; blue the opposite.

source

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate when they don’t include info on how to READ easily-shareable images like this. Put it in the PICTURE, science communicators! OP is in the minority here by providing the source.

    Red indicates a higher average temperature from the previous year. Blue is the opposite.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d just have thought they had some absolute scale going. It’s a relative scale. This can lead to wildly wrong conclusions. Not in this case as the message would be the same mostly, but still.

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Relative scale is worse. Not only that the temperatures keep going up and aren’t a fixed “red”, but that there’s few to no blues now, meaning it’s always going up everywhere. And this is actually a more calming way to present it that the usual exponential spike chart.

    • MasimatutuOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for pointing it out, I’ll add it in the description right away.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh no, I hope you didn’t think my criticism was directed at you! You linked the source…most others would not. I’m mad at the writers who include these images and graphs without a key.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ll complain even further. What is even pictures of ? And what is the horizontal axis?

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but what are the pictures? Are they supposed to show the geographical globe or are they pixels of each day of that year or something?

          Sure, the overall point is very clear, but it’s generally good practice to label everything. It’s not that I don’t believe the data, it’s just… What am I even looking at?

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s what I was originally saying. The image doesn’t TELL us anything, just shows us colors

  • Aatube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really want a full-res view of one of these little pictures so I can know where’s where

      • Aatube@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The time scale on the left is literally in decades, how is this a sunrise

        (judging by how you posted it there you don’t seem to be joking)

        Edit: Huh, so that sub is about illusions in the thumbnail, but I don’t really think it looks like that

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I assume this community and others like it on other instances are going to be just like the sub Reddit. Sensationalised data presented in a terrible way.

      Before anyone jumps on me - I’m not saying the world isn’t heating up.