• Josephine Roper@transportation.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    @tom_andraszek @ajsadauskas @TheOne Free PT is one way to align payment frequency (well, remove the pay-per-trip and replace it with nothing), but another is discounted long term public transport passes, creating pre-commitment to taking public transport. And another, perhaps more politically difficult, is road fares per car trip…

    • Josephine Roper@transportation.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      @tom_andraszek @ajsadauskas @TheOne Well not perhaps, obviously more difficult. Discounted monthly passes already used to exist, and I don’t see that they’re technically incompatible with smart-card systems.

      Monthly or yearly passes could be salary sacrified and/or a welfare benefit, resulting in many people getting effectively free PT - but seeing it differently from general free PT, as a thing of value that they paid for/were given and should take advantage of… maybe.

    • Tom Andraszek@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      @jroper @ajsadauskas @TheOne - oh, people are definitely #PredictablyIrrational when making decisions - check out the 2008 book by Dan Ariely, especially the chapter about the disproportional power of free.

      Yep, if you want people to use something less, make them pay for it every time they use it (there are no PT passes in Queensland).

      Also, people rarely compare total car ownership costs, which some PT advocates are fixated on, vs fares. It’s per trip decision if you have a car already.