• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    why put so goddamn much of it out of reach

    You’re assuming that it was only tuned for human life and/or that life is meant to leave its home planet.

    A gardener designs a garden so that each plant has a place and doesn’t let any plant take over the whole garden. If “someone” designed this place, it is entirely possible that we are stuck in a corner for a reason.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not just our home planet. Because the universe is expanding we won’t ever get further than our local group before it’s receding faster than the speed of light. Almost all of the universe is inaccessible at liminal speeds.

      If I thought the universe was made “for” anything it would probably be black holes.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The point is that you are assuming “inaccessibility” is incompatible with a universe “made for life”. But it’s entirely possible that inaccessibility is a feature, not a bug.

        At the risk of anthopomorphizing, every nonhuman life I’m responsible for is given very little access to move elsewhere. The fish stay in their tank, the dogs stay in the yard, the plants stay in their pots. They are not meant to freely roam (or seed) the rest of my town, much less the universe.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who says the universe is empty? It’s mostly inaccessible by humans, but it might be teeming with life. Though not necessarily intelligent life.