• kvasir476@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Two things not mentioned it that article:

    1. Why would anyone want to fight for a country that is so callously disinterested in the welfare of it’s citizens?

    2. In the last quarter-century it has become extremely apparent that the US Military is not the “global force for good” that it wants to portray itself as. Most young people probably aren’t interested in joining up to commit war crimes in the name of making money for the military industrial complex.

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. Every branch of the military has become increasingly toxic, cutting things like training and cleaning up black mold in favor of new uniforms every 2 years
    • Grumble@techhub.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      @kvasir476 @throws_lemy Suggested edit: After “In the last quarter-century” insert “I’ve finally noticed”.

      Butler saw the scam first-hand, 100 years ago. Every generation seems it must relearn the lessons of our grandparents.

      As for young people not enlisting for wars of convenience - exactly. That’s partially why a draft was around, and why it was so unpopular. And why the money each service pays for college benefits goes way up when there’s a shooting war and goes down in peacetime.

      My time in the Navy overlapped with the VEAP program, which would give me a 2-to-1 match for college - up to the maximum contribution of $2700. What a joke.

      Compare that to the current GI Bill plus extra money each service pays directly.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      \3. Pay hasn’t kept up with civilian work.

      \4. They stopped offering student loan repayment as a benefit.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. They stopped offering student loan repayment as a benefit.

        What really? That was the biggest reason anyone joined when I was in. Wow. So the headline should be “Military reduces benefits of service, less people willing to serve”

        • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          After Germany declared war on them? They didn’t defeat them out of good will, in fact, I’d say America and South Africa were the closest things to Nazi Germany outside of the Reich

            • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Should I remind you of the land the USA originally had and what they did to the people who lived in the lands they conquered?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is it good to beat the shit out of the school bully after he picks a fight with you so he learns to stop picking fights with people? I would say so.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s a difference between being a good country and being a global force for good. In helping to defeat the Nazis, the U.S. was a global force for good regardless of what else they did, had done or will do. The same with Stalinist Russia.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would say it was a combined effort, but Russia suffered a lot more. They didn’t liberate Paris though.

            • Nudding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was a combined effort, but Russia did most of the work and lost most of the lives? Nice

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The Russians did nothing on the Western Front or North Africa.

                But yes, they lost the most lives. I’m not sure why that means it wasn’t a collaborative effort. Are you claiming that if the U.S. and Britain had sat by and done nothing, Russia would have defeated Hitler singlehandedly and liberated Western Europe? Because I find that to be a very spurious claim if so.

              • FireTower@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Suffering more losses does equate to contributing more to towards the victory. For example America’s Lend Lease Act didn’t cost American soldiers but contributed towards the allied victory.

          • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not really, no. And let’s ignore the part where the only reason they even fought is because Russia wanted to conquer some of the same land as Germany 😂

              • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Because Stalin didn’t invade Poland and the Baltic states, right? And he didn’t sign agreements with hitler before the war?

                Oh oh let me guess, they were “saving them from Nazis”! Now where have I heard that before…

                • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The west constantly uses the memory of appeasement to justify its killings today but back when it was happening Stalin tried to start the war when Hitler could be easily crushed. It’s only after the west decided they would rather use the nazis to kill the communists than prevent the holocaust that deal was made.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve seen the bullshit reasons the US government use to send people to war and we’ve seen how the veterans are treated by Congress.

  • NotAFuckingBot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, we don’t want to fight for racist, corrupt, misogynous, traitorous shitheads like Trump and DeSantis.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      As pretty much any political minority will tell you, the country constantly uses us like ping pong balls and cat toys to win elections or internal battles.

      I am sick of my rights, welfare, sense of safety, and hope for the future being dangled in front of me and ripped away over and over again so billionaires and career politicians can be greedy.

      So, yeah. Not interested in serving. If my country wants me to fight for it, then it should fight for me as well.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have two sons in their early 20s and I’m scared to death one of these fascist chucklefucks decides to get us into some conflict we don’t need to be in just because he wants to prove he has BDE and reinstates the draft.

      • NotAFuckingBot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was in the Air Force in the late 70s. Twenty years ago (roughly) I pushed both my boys into the military, because they were being fuck-ups and I didn’t know any other way at the time.

        I’m thankful as all hell that they had the good sense to tell the military to get fucked when in Basic and got out.

        Learn from my stupidity.

        • billwashere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some people can thrive in the military for sure. I have a stepson that’s one of the hardest workers I know. He has issues with basic life skills (anxiety and stress) and taking care of things on his own but thrives in an environment with lots of discipline and order. He’s too old know but had he gotten into the military I’m sure his life would have been much better now.

          But given some of the things they send the military to do recently (cough cough …Afghanistan) it seems like a waste of human life and resources. I’m glad your boys were smart enough to understand it wasn’t a good fit for them at the time and had the courage to make that decision. Hopefully it’s worked out for them.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was honestly the main reason why I didn’t join the military over the last few years.

      That and I just refuse to be a part of it.

  • AmberPrince@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eustice, who served 26 years in the Minnesota National Guard, noted that young adults were the military’s prime target for new recruits—currently Generation Z, or those born after 1997—and argued that growing up in the internet age had made them used to “immediate gratification.”

    Oh look, another out of touch boomer. ItS tHoSe DaMn CeLlPhOnEs! Gen Z grew up watching America get involved in, then stay involved in, a deeply unpopular war. Gen Z grew up in an age where you can fact check someone on the spot and it makes it that much harder for recruiters to lie. They grew up in an age where half of the government is trying to drag the country backwards by any means.

    I am in the military. I overheard my leadership talking with a woman who wanted to get out. When they asked her why she said it was because of the Roe V Wade decision. “Why would I fight for a country that won’t fight for me?” I don’t blame her.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      A person saying kids don’t want to join the military because they’re too used to “instant gratification” is some of the most obnoxious shit I have ever heard lmao

      If someone went up to me and said that, I’d tell them to go fuck themselves and leave, because fuck all of that.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a child who was born in 1999. The other thing men and women of that general age group has heard is “DON’T JOIN THE MILITARY” from their parents, starting at a young age.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I was in the military, the Marines in fact. I will tell my two children don’t join the military, especially don’t join the Marines, and if you need to join the Air Force and work on AC units or some shit.

        Everyone here suggesting joining the military means you’re going to combat is mistaken. When I was in a combat role, the number we always heard was 10% of people in the military are in combat ops jobs, and 10% of those people see actual combat. The military absolutely offers opportunities to learn a trade for folks who are in a tough spot, and you can make it work for you.

        Everyone who says shits fucked now and the country is just billionaires, I’m totally on board. But if you’re some poor kid from Mississippi, being an engine mechanic in the Army might be your best shot at a decent life, and I wouldn’t begrudge anyone that.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah well, soldiers haven’t fought for their country for decades. Instead they’ve been fighting for the interest of industrialized military, and the whims of politicians.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the american military-industrical complex is little more than a welfare/jobs program for americans with profits made overseas while at home were prostetlized that were ‘defending’ ourselves with overt patriotism

      its absolutely revolting, and it boggles my mind how anyone in the military can find this a good thing for humanity.

      • cuibono@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remember the video of the Iraq vet that was screaming at Bush to apologize in 2021 I think? He talked about all his friends being dead and a million Iraqis being dead all because of a bunch of lies. And while Iraq was one of the latest foreign failures, it was far from the only one. It just so happened to occur right around the same time the internet started connecting everyone. MSM couldn’t whitewash or ignore what was actually happening like it could a few decades prior.

  • tryplot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    A country is supposed to provide 4 things to it’s citizens, and the united states are failing on all 4.

    1. food: “We are in danger of running out of food,” said Vince Hall, Feeding America’s chief government relations officer. “We are doing everything we can to avert a major hunger crisis.

    2. safe to drink water: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’ government study finds

    3. shelter: Homelessness rates have been climbing nationally by about 6% every year since 2017, the alliance said.

    4. safety: The record 48,830 total gun deaths in 2021 reflect a 23% increase since 2019

    additionally, nearly every fundamental system (education, healthcare, insurance, car-dependent city designs, etc.) within the united states is designed to take everything away (or restrict access to everything) from it’s citizens through poverty, thus making the above problems exponentially worse.

    What is there to fight for?

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d definitely fight FOR our country. But I would not fight for our country and those that currently control it. They’re after all, the ones we have to fight against.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not really. You just need to go back to my first post in this thread. Explains it perfectly. The country itself. I would fight to save it from the people that currently run it. But I would not fight for (in service of) the country and the people that currently run it.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The country isn’t, like, its own entity. America isn’t real. There isn’t some ideological spirit of America that you can separate from the people that run it. At most you could argue that America is also its culture, but uh, the culture has been pretty fucking bad since the start!

                American society is terrible. America’s government is terrible. American culture is terrible. It’s an irredeemable shithole country.

                What the fuck would you fight for?

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Actually there is. They talk and talk and talk about it ad nauseam. They simply just do it rhetorically and always fail to embody it. Even countries with a traditionally large immigrant population like the United States have a lot more culturally that tends to bind, then they have differences that divide. And after all what is a country? If not the people in it?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      … And its 1, 2,3 what are we fighting for?

      Don’t ask me I don’t give a damn,

      The next stop is Vietnam,

      And its 5, 6,7 open up the pearly gates,

      Well there ain’t no time to wonder why,

      WHOOPEE we’re all gonna die

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    why in the fuck would any sane person sign up to die in a failed attempt to implement some shitty politician’s whim half a world away? no one has fought for America in decades, they fight for the aristocrats.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Centuries. Up to ww1 they’re was an official policy of isolationism militarily, we only got into ww1 because Germany was pissed off we were selling everyone arms, WW2 happened because Germany was pissed off we were selling everyone arms…

      If we kept to ourselves we wouldn’t likely have ever entered either war and the “moral war” excuse only cropped up after we were attacked in both wars.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “moral war” excuse only cropped up after we were attacked

        I think a lot of people would agree that the US had at least some moral authority to enter WWII after pearl harbor. Did it happen because we used diplomatic and economic policies in provocative ways that essentially amounted to taking a side? Yeah, but it also happened. The people who were killed really did die.

        • Chocrates@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are also kind of white washing the US’s imperialist murdering before WW1. We were at war with Spain for dubious reasons and then we invaded the Phillipenes and murdered anyone that didn’t like us extracting wealth and resources from them.
          And that is a single instance.

          We don’t like to call it war when it isn’t against Europeans.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, that said we did not enter the war because it was a moral obligation, we got into the war because we did capitalist bullshit that got us attacked. The only moral war in the last two centuries is arguably the civil war and that could easily be argued to be a economic decision not at all a moral one.

          I imagine I’m going to get pushback about the civil war thing but let me be clear, slavery is immoral no question. It just isn’t actually why we got involved in the civil war, that was purely an economic decision.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would call WWII a moral war, at least for the allies. WWI was just imperialist bullshit plus an arms race. WWII was a very different beast.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It may be because we can look at it from a modern perspective, but yeah, I would gladly sign up to kill some nazis. At the time, many, many Americans were actually sympathetic to the nazi party. Pearl Harbor is what galvanized us against the Axis.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We did not enter either way for moral reasons. There’s also no moral war but that’s another issue entirely given wars throughout history tend to be for land or resources with the occasional excuse otherwise.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s because Democrats are brainwashing people to hate their country and has absolutely nothing to do with Republicans voting AGAINST any and all help for veterans, Republicans constantly stopping service member pay with government shutdowns, billionaires killing us so they can make an extra dollar, billionaires using us to do dangerous tasks for minimal pay or Republicans voting to dismantle the VA. It’s OBVIOUSLY the Democrats fault!

  • watson387@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Killing brown people so the oligarchy can exploit their natural resources is not fighting for your country.

    • bobalot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it is that (it should be).

      Unemployment is at historic lows and real wages are starting to grow again.

      There plenty of alternatives that don’t involve risking your life.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This lie is akin to “No one wants to work anymore”

    It’s not remotely true. It’s just some bullshit the employer says when they’re not paying enough and they treat their employees like shit.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think this is true. I lived in a big military town and not fighting for an America whose policies I didn’t agree with was one reason I avoided the military when so many of my friends and classmates joined and served.

      Nobody joins the military because they want a job where they are treated well. Pay and benefits definitely factor into it big time though, and are probably the main reason my late brother joined. He and I talked about how that is effectively mercenary though. Of course there are a lot of great things in America to join the military and defend, and we still do have a lot of freedoms that other countries do not, but it’s pretty clear that it’s not what it used to be. America isn’t even in the top 10 on the human freedom index (we’re 14th). https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/freedom-index-by-country

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was in 7th Grade when the towers fell. That whole day nothing happened and we just watched the news. Once we had a day or two to digest it my Social Studies teacher talked to us about what it meant. She talked about how the Vietnam war lasted nearly 20 years and that was not triggered by an attack on US soil. She basically told me that everything was going to change and that we were going to be fighting someone forever.

      I’m sure she wasn’t quite that precient at the time and I am colouring my memories, but she really got it to stick that the world had changed overnight for us.

      Long story short, we have been murdering brown kids in their homes my entire life. Even if more death and destruction is justified in response, we really went overboard. Why would people my age and younger have any fucking desire to support more of that?

      PLUS we finally talk a little more about mental health in this country and it is clear that when you brainwash young people to be ok with murdering humans, and then have them do that while watching their friends get blown up, they fuck their brains up.

      I was on track to go in to the military as a kid. I wanted to serve my country and get college paid for, but by the time I was 18 it no longer seemed like a fair trade. I’ll go in to debt to the capitalists to start my life, seemed like a better deal than a pension and a lifetime of demons from my past to battle.