uncapybarable@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.comexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mllinux@kbin.sociallinux@kbin.socialtechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1129arrow-down1external-linkRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.comuncapybarable@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square79fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mllinux@kbin.sociallinux@kbin.socialtechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareJuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoA lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.
A lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.