• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That didn’t happen with Perot or Nader. I find it very hard to believe that would happen this time.

    Why can’t you just admit that you can’t give me a name?

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you don’t want to vote for someone who doens’t have a chance of winning then just stay home

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I didn’t say anyone should stay home.

        I said:

        If there is no candidate that has such a chance, why bother voting?

        You have not given me a good reason. Your reason so far is not supported by history. Neither Perot nor Nader changed a thing. Unless you can give me a good reason why that will be different this time around, you are grasping at straws.

        If you want to vote, fine. Go ahead. I just don’t see why you’re bothering when you can’t even give a good reason. Seems like a lot of effort for nothing.