- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
Archive link: https://archive.ph/cIz4A
It’s dated to be from around 2400 BCE. The article doesn’t clarify if it’s a true alphabet or an abjad, but either way it’s interesting.
You think the dividing line between us and animals is writing? There were pre-writing civilisations last century. You’d have fit right in with the morals of the time.
Wow, I can’t believe my comment about my appreciation of the humility impressed upon me by historical perspective was deleted. Being reminded of how new writing is fascinating and gives me peace (and I’ve been needing more of that lately). Linguistics itself is so cool, but knowing how recent some developments are adds greatly to my understanding of my own existence and adds a deeper meaning to my life.
I also can’t understand why you’re interpreting my comment so extremely. Your point further illustrates how young humans are as phenomenon in the universe. It’s obviously not the only dividing line. And we’re likely never going to be truly separate. Parts of our brain and nervous system are always going to overlap with our relatives in the animal kingdom. And animals have shown higher order thinking, tool use, and compassion often associated more with humans.
Edit: Okay, I see that my drop of politics within a much bigger point was enough to get the comment deleted.
Here’s a censored version that avoids the politics:
This discovery affected me on a personal level to give me hope for the future. It helps me to be more forgiving of myself and others. Isn’t the date of the observation significant? Not just the symbols in and of themselves?
That’s not a linguistic observation, but the pursuit of knowledge (such as linguistics) doesn’t exist in a vacuum separated from the context, interest, and desires of individuals.