• Ignacio@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t use stuff from that continent (in fact, as far as I know, Kbin is European, and lemmy.world is even based in Europe). But when I browse through all, majority of content is related to US somehow, and majority of comments are related to something in the US too.

      I can block communities and instances, obviously, but generic communities are being pushed to US culture somehow, despite having allegedly users from other countries and continents. And there is no filter, unfortunately, so either block or get bombarded by US-related stuff

      • Pra@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Would it be because most EU countries are using other sites that are in their own language? Idk why I’d visit a predominantly English site if my English wasn’t super proficient. That would just leave the US, UK, and Aus mostly, and the US dwarfs those by quite a bit.

        • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          US dwarfs those by quite a bit, yes. But India dwarfs the US in number of English speakers. Really, a majority, or at least a plurality, of English speakers are from India.

  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes because this community definitely doesn’t have a huge bias towards US culture.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually when I moved here from Reddit I really enjoyed that it seemed like the perspectives weren’t so US-focused. I don’t know if there were really more non-US folks or if maybe the more left leaning userbase meant I noticed it less. But now I feel like I’ve been in quite a few threads where US dominance was in full force, like the one asking why weed is illegal but alcohol not, or anything that mentions gun control.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          Weed is not illegal for the majority of Americans, funny enough. Europe is a different story.

        • _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh for sure. When I joined, servers and communities dedicated to specific countries or even cities had a bit of activity. Used to see a lot of German, Austrian, french, Dutch, Australian and NZ content in my feed. Now only the Germans and Australians, sometimes.

            • See, I always imagined Aussies as redneck brits, but somehow more approachable and friendly. But as they are quite literally on the other side of the world, I haven’t interacted with enough Aussies to confirm or deny such prejudice.

              You guys really as friendly as my imagination suggests?

                • Obi@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  From my limited experience, kiwis and Canadians are friendly in a more polite/well-mannered way, Aussies are friendly in a more, errr, “colourful” way.

          • The Dutch are usually pretty good at announcing their presence, as they will flock to anything even remotely associated with their country. Just look at the comments on a Not Just Bikes video and you’ll see for yourself.

            They’re also massive shitposters, so expect to find them in the less serious parts of the fediverse.

            Both provide great strategies to pull them out of hiding.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are more lemmy servers hosted in the U.S. than any other country, although they certainly don’t make up the majority. IDK about users though.

  • monko@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t get it. Are you saying that lemmy.world has too many US users? Why would that matter?

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      As an American:

      I do try to avoid spaces with an over abundance of other Americans. Largely because I get way more than my share of American news pushed at me on all fronts every day and those people just tend to echo what CNN/Fox has to say about something over and over.

      But to other nationalities, any space with a US presence is regarded as “CIA controlled propaganda and those Americans are all slaves of their rich overlords and their capitalism is the singular reason the world is shit”

      Believe it or not, American media exists on a spectrum too, just like anywhere. Ironically, the people who spout this uninformed nonsense remind me of the lowest-common-denominator types of Americans who are afraid of Chinese immigrants and healthcare because “communism”.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t regard any place with the US presence as a CIA clubhouse, but you must admit, The Default Country for many on the internet, here included, is the US. So yeah, most of the news are the US news

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          And to add, even our so-called “left-leaning” news outlets have a STRONG pro-establishment pro-capitalist bias, but we’re so immersed in it that I feel like it’s super hard to recognize. Anarchist and Marxist sources often get called out for their obvious bias, but guess what? CNN, MSNBC, WaPo… those are just as biased, but they’re more aligned to the status quo so we fail to see it.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Usually when people complain about bias, it’s because the news source is promoting something undesirable. If you agree with the viewpoints and ideology, then you’re not going to complain about bias usually, unless there’s some politics at play.

            • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes exactly. This is also why those sites that proclaim to measure bias tend to be utterly subjective. They themselves show bias in their criteria and methodology

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because it means that contributions are always leaning towards American viewpoints. From politics being mainly concerned with US politics to comments being written from an English speaking, US perspective.

      Would you join an instance with a dominating presence of Russian or Chinese or Brazilian or South African or Iranian users? I hope you can see why it matters now.

        • monko@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Same. But I don’t think the Russians or Chinese would give two shits what I think about them dominating an online space lol

          Also pretty sure Iranians are struggling to get online rn let alone take over an instance

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            But I don’t think the Russians or Chinese would give two shits what I think about them dominating an online space

            I’d expect anyone who’s dominating to not give a shit about others, because such a status somewhat benefits them.

            Except that such a situation strengthens bias and creates an echo-chamber which may be problematic in the long run but isn’t seen as an issue most of the time, I think

        • Ignacio@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There is no need to read those languages. Translations are still a thing. I remember that, while on Reddit, r/Europe posted links in other languages, but OP provided an English translation. So, yes, you can post national news in your official language, whatever it is, and post its translation, and now you have an international community or instance.

          But it seems I’m the only one who posts links in my official language (Spanish) on international communities.

      • monko@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        So, you’re saying that US users on lemmy.world are keeping other nationalities from talking about issues or viewpoints relevant to them?

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, not at all. But by sheer number of submissions and comments the collective hive mind will tend towards topics that are relevant for the biggest population.

          It’s nothing malicious. People are simply less likely to upvote and engage with content that does not interest them or is not relevant for them. All natural of course. But the side effect is that minority topics are suppressed.

          • Alk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            There really are just a lot of us. Many English speaking platforms will naturally be filled with US folks because of the sheer number of us.

            • Turun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Exactly!

              For what it’s worth, the same issue exists in German speaking communities as well. /r/de is the subreddit for all German speakers. But while the Austrians and Swiss are explicitly invited too, by sheer number of citizens the news about German politics make up the vast majority of submissions in the subreddit.

              The same probably applies to my account’s instance (feddit.de), though I am not sure if the swiss and austrians have dedicated instances as well. Thanks to federation the effect is lessened, because every country (or otherwise defined group) can have their own frontpage. (E.g. lemmy.ca or lemmy.blahaj.zone)

          • monko@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would love to see some examples of these minority topics being down voted or suppressed since it seems to be deeply affecting international users’ experience.

            To me, it seems like you and the OP resent US users for simply existing in an online space without putting forth any solutions to the issue. Are you sure you’re not trying to find ways to justify anti-US bias?

            If you want the space to have more equal representation, why not produce high-quality content that appeals to your fellows rather than moaning about people who by your own admission mean no harm?

            • Turun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              As @princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone already pointed out (thanks girl!), I never said they would get downvoted. It’s just that if US news are upvoted and international news are not, then sorting by upvotes (which any reasonable algorithm will do), will inevitably lead to a reduced visibility of said international news.

              Thanks to federation the frontpage itself is mostly non specific memes and tech/Linux content. But if you want a concrete example: here is a screenshot of !news@lemmy.world. the name of the community would suggest well, world news. The reality is … Quite different:

              The nine posts in the screenshot are about:

              • Elon musk (50/50)
              • Jk Rowling & a new Scottish law (international)
              • US traffic blockades (US)
              • Donald Trump (US)
              • Israel war (international)
              • US jails (US)
              • US housing (US)
              • Donald Trump (US)
              • Donald Trump (US)

              If you want the space to have more equal representation, why not produce high-quality content that appeals to your fellows rather than moaning about people who by your own admission mean no harm?

              As i have just explained in my first paragraph this will not be enough. (And that’s aside from the extra effort required to keep up said high quality work. Even if it would lead to equal representation, it’s an uphill battle.)

              Are you sure you’re not trying to find ways to justify anti-US bias?

              Yes, I am sure. I am merely stating a fact. This dynamic develops in any online space with a clear majority group. For example, take the /r/de subreddit. It is the default subreddit for German speaking users on reddit. Austrian and Swiss users are explicitly invited. And yet, by sheer number of citizens the news about German politics dominate the submissions. I do no more resent Germans for up voting content that interest them on /r/de (for example myself) than I resent Americans upvoting content that interests them.

              Similarly you can take any other instance that is specific to a group, be it defined via country (e.g. lemmy.ca) or shared interest/experience (e.g. lemmy.blahaj.zone) and you will find that minorities that are not part of that definition will inevitably be suppressed. But these country or interest specific instances do not claim to cover the world. In fact, OP was probably writing this post not due to the presence of US citizens on Lemmy, but due to the overwhelming presence of US citizens on an instance that claims to represent the world. Renaming !news@lemmy.world to !usnews@lemmy.world would go a long way.

              • monko@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sure, petition to rename it. I don’t think anyone would care, except the folks feeling suppressed by American exceptionalism.

                Or, idk, start your own world news instance with super strict rules, zero US stuff. No one is stopping you. Isn’t that the point of this platform?

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The comment you replied to very clearly said “less likely to upvote” not that topics are downvoted. But this kind of American exceptionalism is like 90% of the problem I have with spaces being dominated by y’all. Frankly it’s insufferable how far up your own arses you’ve stuffed your heads.

              • monko@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                Do you think “supress” simply means “not up voting non-US content?” Okay, maybe I got that one wrong.

                But you really don’t get how hostile you guys come off toward US folks who are just existing?

                I mean, your comment is the very embodiment 9f the anti-US sentiment I see from so many. What are people supposed to do to appease you?

                • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  You barged in here and mischaracterised what someone said so you could be outraged…SMH and you still think we all are the problem.

                  The one thing that you could do, that any American could do, is be capable of introspection on this stuff. But this thread kinda proves how impossible that is. Other people and places exist. English is the lingua franca of the Internet. Would y’all please stop being so self-centred?

            • Ignacio@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              To me, it seems like you and the OP resent US users for simply existing in an online space without putting forth any solutions to the issue. Are you sure you’re not trying to find ways to justify anti-US bias?

              If you want the space to have more equal representation, why not produce high-quality content that appeals to your fellows rather than moaning about people who by your own admission mean no harm?

              EDIT:

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I would love to see some examples of these minority topics being down voted or suppressed since it seems to be deeply affecting international users’ experience

              Could you please provide some examples? I am at a loss about what that could be except some hate topics that I expect to naturally get downvoted

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            i appreciate your leveled and honest analysis here. others are nitpicking your choice of language but personally this is the best summary of the situation i have seen to date :)

    • Ignacio@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I already do, not every day but sometimes, when I see something worth to be published. You can check inside my profile.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean they’re not wrong, but it does seem silly to complain about American politics on a website where most people are American.

      They could block instances/users posting content they don’t want to see, or browse by “subscribed.”

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve personally considered blocking .world, but I like a lot of the users there and so I’d miss seeing them around. Like stamets and hamid, for instance (no pun intended)

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, I personally didn’t notice anything like that tbh, or at least not more than on other social media platforms like Reddit

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    You should have called them CIA plants, or Feds. That would have really showed them.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That’s just US Election Season

    Gringos tend to vore every conversation when that time rolls around.

    Let them get it out their systems. They are in pain.

    I’m from Latin America, btw.