CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoHear me out...sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1160arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1146arrow-down1imageHear me out...sh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·7 months agoI think they need 20k nukes on ICBMs, middle range and artillery warheads.
minus-squareLouNeko@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·7 months agoBut Tomboys are the next best thing.
minus-squareBraveLittleToaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·edit-27 months agoWhat about tomboys with nukes?
minus-squareharrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·7 months agoThat sounds…umm… excuse me, I need some private time.
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-27 months ago Technically speaking every 155mm howitzer could shoot nuke ammo, but the range is kinda important. This is one reason why they rejected nuke field mortars and grandes.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoYou should look up the Davy Crockett.
I think they need 20k nukes on ICBMs, middle range and artillery warheads.
But Tomboys are the next best thing.
What about tomboys with nukes?
That sounds…umm… excuse me, I need some private time.
¿Por qué no los dos?
Gimme that towed artillery nuke
Technically speaking every 155mm howitzer could shoot nuke ammo, but the range is kinda important. This is one reason why they rejected nuke field mortars and grandes.
You should look up the Davy Crockett.