• Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a 2-part real analysis course. I took the first one alongside complex analysis and the second alongside topology.

    Shit was wild I kept leaning the same thing in 2 different classes in 2 different contexts, which made relating everything so much easier.

    Definitely not as easy as the first semester of my BS, though. I took logic (as a philosophy credit), foundations, Algebra 1 (because the day before classes started I asked the teacher if the course would cover octonian algebra; I wanted to learn about non-associativity) and a bioethics class. That entire semester was learning how to argue and it was awesome.

  • assa123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well, those properties are only for holomorphic functions, otherwise it’s just as hard or worse. Edit: ’

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Holomorphicity is equivalent to (or defined as) being differentiable in a nonempty, connected, open set, so it’s not asking much. Even then, functions which fail to be holomorphic can often be classified in a similarly rigid way.