What’s your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        From a human perspective, yes, that’s exactly what it does

        If you want to get pedantic about the technical details, it’s not time splitting if you’re not splitting the time…

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Technically speaking, isn’t differentiating between any two things pedantic? For example the moon, and chocolate, both are things. If you don’t want to get pedantic about it.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            What I mean is if you don’t slice time into slots, you’re not using time slicing. It doesn’t make sense to talk about time slicing at all anymore

            Two devices can transmit at the same time with all sorts of setups, even on the same frequency. And it’s not inaccurate to describe time slicing as “a method to allow multiple devices to transmit and receive simultaneously”

            The question isn’t valid. Being truly pedantic would be pointing out that any number of devices can transmit at the same time, you didn’t say the messages would be received