• I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I picked engineering. Let the physicists do the hard work of figuring out how the universe works, then I’ll step in with a handbook of formulas that you already derived and take someone’s money to stamp it.

  • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    Can someone please teach whoever made this about the basics of graphic design? I can hardly read this ity-bity condensed as fuck text on top of a potato quality complicated background. Good God.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I feel like this was written as a self-roast by someone in neuroscience. If it is written by someone outside of the field I would definitely agree with you though…

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Given the heavy use of subject-specific jargon, I’d guess as much. I wouldn’t go to the length of looking up neuroscience terms just to roast neuroscientists, because that just seems like a poor happy chemical return on the mental energy investment, whatever the proper terms for that might be.

        Now, if you’d ask me to build a data model to analyse my unhappiness for key influencers, we’re in business.

        • DozensOfDonner
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          To be fair, the neuroscience terminology used is pretty surface level, one wikipedia stroll would have done it.