Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m still on the learning path of Linux. But there doesn’t seem to many forks of OpenSuse? There are a bunch of forks of Arch, Fedora and Debian, but why not OpenSuse? Is it a license problem or something else?

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe no one can improve on OpenSuse. It’s also one of the lesser known distributions and wasn’t much talked for long time. Maybe there is not much to fork on, because OpenSuse basically does everything and satisfies most people.

    Debian in example its hard to get into and make changes, and did not accept lot of packages in example. That means lot of people wanted to have an alternative. Debian is also opinionated and slow on updates, so there is lot of things people want to have it differently. And on Archlinux, its basically barebones distribution where lot of manual work is required to set it up. Its basically the perfect base distribution to fork on or derive from.

    There are actually a few: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg

    • Gecko Linux
    • EasyNAS
    • Rockstor

    • blackbrook
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Gecko is basically just a different installer for openSUSE and some different default settings.