fossilesqueM to Science MemesEnglish · 2 months agoDreams come trueimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1649arrow-down15
arrow-up1644arrow-down1imageDreams come truefossilesqueM to Science MemesEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49·2 months agoAnd they expect you to do this for free?
minus-squareApathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 months agoDo they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 months agoIf it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
minus-squareRolando@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoAnyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoFor profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
minus-squarephdepressed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoAnd yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
minus-squareRolando@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoAgreed that you should have some kind of “service” on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.
minus-squarephdepressed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoSuch as? They’re all predatory just to varying degrees.
minus-squarethesporkeffect@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoMaybe check the other comments.
And they expect you to do this for free?
Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
Nah, they get “Exposure”!
/s
Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
For profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
And yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
Agreed that you should have some kind of “service” on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.
Such as? They’re all predatory just to varying degrees.
deleted by creator
Maybe check the other comments.