Oh, it is already happening. There are a LOT of these people in my part of the country. They are all fuming because their compensation is getting cut, and some companies are moving to Europe, in preparation for the Trump tariffs.
Are they connecting this to Trump though, are they taking the Trump flags off?
Even if they did make the connection, it takes more than that to break free from a cult.
Oh sure, I’m just curious if parent has observed it. I don’t have access to people like that to observe.
No idea, but I am going to doubt. I predict it won’t be long before this is Biden’s fault.
It’s the “Thanks Obama” saying repackaged. They were so obsessed with him for so long after he left office.
Trump is still obsessed with him.
Press F to doubt
and some companies are moving to Europe
Yay labour laws then.
Imagine being pro union but also somehow libertarian. Fuckin wild. Do they not realize that in a libertarian system anyone trying to form a union would be fired immediately?
Maybe they want small government…so they can fight the government with their union?
It’s a bit like saying that you want to fight Mike Tyson, but only if you remove his arms and vision.
That’s easy to do, it only takes 20 million dollars
Not if the Taft-Hartley Act is abolished. They usually don’t know about that regulation so I start there.
They’d be fired, evicted from their home, have their bank account closed, and get banned from entering most retail stores.
I’m not sure I understand your point exactly. What exactly does the libertarian philosophy say about unions? A union is essentially just people who choose to associate with eachother and act as a single entity under an employer; in a free market, their bargaining power would be proportional to their size — its growth would impact the pool of potential employees that could be hired outside of the union. There could be, for example, laws in place which prevent a company from firing a union, which a libertarian would generally oppose, but a libertarian needn’t necessarily oppose the concept of unions, imo.
My point was concise and abundantly clear. I’m not sure how one could fail to understand how an employer won’t do anything they’re not compelled to do by law (As evidenced by the very existence of OSHA, for one.) which would include good faith negotiation with a union.
I’m not sure how one could fail to understand how an employer won’t do anything they’re not compelled to do by law (As evidenced by the very existence of OSHA, for one.) which would include good faith negotiation with a union.
As long as the market is competitive and the agents involved are well-informed. Things like OSHA come in to play when the second requirement fails; if it is not possible for a consumer to make a well-informed purchase, then there should be reasonable protections in place for that consumer to make up for the deficiency.
My point was concise and abundantly clear.
I wasn’t asking for your opinion of the clarity of your own post. All that’s important in this conversation is that your point wasn’t clear to me. If one is interested in continuing a conversation in good faith, then they would want to make sure that all parties involved are accurately following what’s being said.
This is one of the biggest flaws Democrats have.
They’re good at getting shit done, but horrible at letting anyone know they did it.
So they fix something, give a speech that translates to “Political nerd shit!” and middle America doesn’t care, doesn’t listen, or worst of all… attempts to listen and has no idea what is being said.
Meanwhile Trump does nothing, directly takes credit for a good thing that happened regardless of or even in spite of him, and then they cheer for it because they don’t hear “Political nerd shit”, they hear “I got ya a big one, there’s never been anything like this. We won huge!”
And then they applaud because although nothing is actually happening because Trump is incompetent, they FEEL like maybe something is.
Look at all the people going “So now that Biden’s leaving, we’re getting more Stimulus Checks right? Cause Trump signed those and he’s back” (Ignoring that that only happened because a pandemic that Trump worsened, and because Democrats in the Senate pushed for it), only for Newscasters to keep having to HARD Deconfirm that anything like that is going to happen.
Biden was kicked out of office and Kamela barred from office, because of problems that Biden and Kamela were both acknowledging and had already been in the middle of solving.
The dumbasses who think Trump’s tariffs are magic spells that lower prices are going to regret the election…
Since I didn’t fuck around, I’d love to skip on “Finding out”
Democrat’s PR team is all Republican undercover agents. You can’t convince me otherwise.
That makes a suspiciously large amount of sense.
“This is going to be great, say everyone who doesn’t vote for you isn’t black or is deplorable!”
I miss Alan Wheat.
Your fucking snek is gonna get stepped on
Snek
No step
What they’re going to learn is that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans care if their families eat, and next election, it’ll be 25 million who decide not to vote instead of ten, like it was this time around.
You “both sides are the same” fools are even worse than the libertarians. What’s your genius idea, buddy? That if you can get nobody to vote in the next election, then the political system will grind to a halt, scratch it’s head and say, oh shit, let’s call FlashMobOfOne and ask them what we do now? LOL
What YOU are going to learn is that apathy like yours is always a Loser’s strategy. All it ever does is ensure that the worst choice gets elected, the one that absolutely does not care to come to the table and listen to your ideas. The one that is 100% Conservative and will do everything in it’s power to undo every Progressive accomplishment.
You know, just like what happened this time. Instead of being a chump your whole life, read some history. You’ll be surprised to see there is a long record of people like you being ignored for hundreds of years.
Sure thing, friend.
Try telling that to wage earners. They live the neglect on both sides every day.
They just told it to me and I agree. How about that.
- Gadsden flag
- Learn
I find this unlikely
How do you mean?
There is a particular kind of idiot that is only such because they are resistant to learning
Are you saying that all people who display Gadsden flag are “resistant to learning”? If so, what is your rationale?
All people who display both a Gadsden flag and pro-union decals are necessarily idiots, and not likely to learn
All people who display both a Gadsden flag and pro-union decals are necessarily idiots […]
What’s your rationale?
All people who display both a Gadsden flag and pro-union decals are necessarily idiots
So you aren’t making a point about the Gadsden flag on its own?
Ahaha 🤣. Right, okay.
At my last contract ratification someone said if we wanted to make more $$ vote trump and the entire place started cheering like crazy.
I recently saw one with the Jesus fish and an AK-47 sticker.
I immediately realized I probably don’t ever wanna talk to this person.
Gotta nuke sum’n
And the result of that is…
I mean… religious types like guns, commonly. That’s a normal thing to see
Unless you’re commenting on it being a Russian made gun, then yeah that’s kinda weird
Well it’s weird cause Jesus said turn the other cheek not embrace murder tools
New Testament word count for Jesus: approximately 1,500 to 2,000
New Testament word count for the Apostle Paul: 32,408
Do you know why women are not allowed to become Pastors at your local church? The bottom-line answer is what Paul wrote in First Timothy 2:10-25
“A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. But I do not allow a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve. And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a wrongdoer.”
Seriously, Google this question and look at all the twisted logic used to justify that a woman’s role is not to lead. Now, think about this for a moment, and about all the people who fully believe in this stuff, who attended Sunday School as a kid, who grew up listening to their male pastors year after year.
Do you really think someone who believes a woman should never be pastor and lead a church congregation, is that person going to vote for a woman to be President and lead the country?
Not sure what you’re trying to say to me here but my simple point was these religious people are hypocrites and generally ignorant to what Jesus taught, and no I’m not a believer
“I love Jesus. I’ll help you meet him” -definitely a weird take
You know what Jesus would’ve loved? Guns!
I think this person is deeply confused.
Checkmate, librul
Jesnold Schwarzenazareth
Christianity was founded on violence, and has continued the tradition ever since.
Western Christianity was co-opted by the Roman state with predictable consequences. But it was already “founded”. There was no undoing the fact that core Christianity was “do no resist an evil person”, “turn the other cheek”, “love your enemy” etc. All features that are inconvenient to a would-be organiser of religious wars.
Sure, if you ignore the whole “anyone who doesn’t believe this deserves to and will be tortured for eternity” part, which is why it was so easy to co-opt in the first place.
Jesus was a long haired, brown skinned, hippie from the middle east.
American Christians would have drone striked him.
Yes, I think Jesus would be almost unique in drawing equal amounts of hate from both the left and right of America. Telling people to lay down their arms while being against gay marriage will do that lol
I drove around with a Jesus fish on the back of one of my cars for 5 years. It looked like it belonged there. It was a raised plastic fish covered with chrome on a silver car.
One day a guy said to me, “I thought you were a non believer.” “What made you say that? Catch me saying, “god please!” or something?” I said.
“Well, you got a religious thing on the back of your car!”
How did I not know that? It was on there so long at that point that I was attached to it. Haha
“Religious? I like fishing!”
Religious? No… It’s a cancer ribbon. To help fight soul cancer.
I can absolutely believe that. I’ve heard of dealers adding a logo in similar font and color and it going unnoticed for years.
Would have been more impact if It would have been rephrase “Please thread on me daddy”
wow. a more accurate maga symbol.
Unions didn’t learn their lesson when they voted Reagan. They won’t learn their lesson when they voted Trump. I hate to say this but they’re tradesmen and not necessarily critical thinkers.
Salt of the earth
[…] they’re tradesmen and not necessarily critical thinkers.
Are you saying that tradesmen aren’t capable of being critical thinkers? Or are you saying that they aren’t critical thinkers in spite of being tradesmen?
I’m saying these tradesmen don’t stop to think that they’re voting against their best interest every time they suffer a major setback from a union busting Republican. Am I saying Biden was better? No, but at least he didn’t dissolve the air traffic control union through the barrel of a rifle.
I’m saying these tradesmen don’t stop to think that they’re voting against their best interest every time they suffer a major setback from a union busting Republican.
What exactly do you mean by “these tradesman”, though? I’m trying to determine if I correctly understood the intent behind your wording as being condescending towards tradesmen.
I think you’re reading too deep into this. They’re skilled workers who specialize in some very difficult jobs and had the good sense to unionize to prevent getting fucked too hard by owners and the management class. That said, I don’t think most of them realize they’re contradicting themselves at the gubernatorial level by electing people who “talk like them” or “tell it like it is” versus someone who at least did the political calculus of siding with them to a small degree on strikes.
Either you’re not answering the question, or I am entirely misunderstanding this entire thread. You said:
I hate to say this but they’re tradesmen and not necessarily critical thinkers.
To me, this comes off as extremely condescending — it reads like you are saying that people who are tradesmen are incapable of complex thought (ie critical thinking). I’m simply asking for you to explicitly clarify that statement. If my reading is incorrect, then how would you word it to make it more clear? How you reword it might clarify your intent and explain your following replies.
They’re skilled workers who specialize in some very difficult jobs and had the good sense to unionize to prevent getting fucked too hard by owners and the management class.
Is this statement clarifying the people that you think “aren’t critical thinkers”?
Racism is stronger than unions it’s what that means
Right, everyone could use a healthy dose of NPR right now. Russia absolutely beat the USA in the Misinformation War.
They never learn. They will just lay blame on anything but the GOP. (Gray Old Pedophiles)
Came to these comments to say “Naive of you to assume they’ll learn anything.”
“I’m a fascist and a right-libertarian and pro-union.” The only positive takeaway I have from this is that some people are so uninformed (or overinformed but with no ability to think critically) that they make these choices – and thus education and outreach may still yet save us.
I hate to say it but dismissing these people like that is how the Dems got here.
This is someone who wants things to be better. They’re pro-union because they want someone to fight for their rights. And they’re pro-Trump because all four years of the Dems has done for them is make prices higher. The Dems have been crowing about how the economy is doing better than ever, but for people like this it’s not. GDP and the Fortune 500 being up is great for investors, but it’s not great for an average worker. For an average worker, things are worse than ever.
They don’t know that much about what Trump stands for, but they know he stands for “something other than this.” And for these people - for the vast majority of people today - “this” isn’t working.
The Dems need to reach voters like this, and they absolutely can. These people aren’t for fascism, they just don’t believe that that’s what they’re voting for. They believe they’re voting for change, and Trump is the only person offering them change. What the Dems offered them was “more of the same”, and that’s not an appealing offer to people who are drowning.
My dude you are not wrong - but how do you talk to these people about policy nuances and compromise to get things done if THEY’RE the ones being dismissive about things and rejecting objective reality? I get that they’re not doing well. That doesn’t mean that anyone (including Trump) can wave a magic wand and make things better. It seems to me the only way to win these voters over is to play the Republican game - get your own propaganda arm for your political party and yell and lie louder than the Republicans.
You’re skipping right past the really simple thing that so few of the Dems; tell them that they’re right.
These people are hurting, and both Harris and Biden simply told them “No you’re not, look how high the NASDAQ is.”
That’s a bullshit way to treat someone when they’re struggling and asking for help. The simplest thing to do is just to say “Yes, you’re right, shit fucking sucks and we need to make it better.”
That’s why people love Bernie. That’s why there’s such a huge crossover in people who voted for Trump and people who voted for AOC. Cortez doesn’t bullshit people. She knows they’re hurting, she knows they’re poorer now than they were four years ago and she says it.
This is what Bernie means when he says the Dems have abandoned the working class. The crazy part is, Biden was actually great for unions. The NLRB under his tenure oversaw one of the largest expansions in union membership in US history. But instead of talking about that they talked about how great people’s fucking investment portfolios are doing. That doesn’t mean shit to people who can’t afford a fucking investment portfolio.
Before they worry about selling people on the details of the plan, the Dems could start by just addressing their problems, instead of telling them they don’t have any problems.
I don’t think I heard Kamala or Biden talk about the stock market much. Their message was that unemployment is down, and inflation adjusted wages are up.
That’s functionally the same. It boils down to “you’re not as bad as you think you are.” The message should start with “we know you’re bad.”
Exactly. Crowing about how successful you’ve been when the people you’re talking to are struggling more than ever just makes them feel like their concerns are being dismissed out of hand.
Trump’s message was “Everything sucks and I will make it better.” They’re not interested in how. They just want the promised results.
Nothing counter indicative with libertarian and union. Unions allow more equal negotiating power with business/capital when government is limited in scope. People should be allowed to decide if they want to unionize for themselves though, without coercion from capital and with protections to be allowed to do so.
Libertarians should also be requesting government do it’s job and crush monopolies and enforce the regulations that keep the “free market” both free and level for all participants, and the right-libertarians are mostly actually theocratic feudalists masquerading as libertarian these days.
That’s why I specified right-libertarian. I think basically all left-libertarians recognize the need for workers’ unions. The problem with right-libertarians here is that they see the union itself and the kinds of government regulation that lets those unions be effective as the entities “treading on” them.
In complete agreement, but would point out that for some (maybe many) center- and right-libertarians they see the graft and waste that the post-labor rights boom era as analogous to tyrannical government due to many nuggets of truth. Labor isn’t immune to corruption any more than capital is, and capital took massive advantage in demonizing unions because of actual flaws to exaggerate.
Police unions getting bad cops rehired and back on the streets has similar analogs in the biggest labor unions. Public sector unions probably shouldn’t exist, and police unions definitely shouldn’t, and some people continue that line of thinking into private sector labor unions.
Any organization of a sufficient size will suffer inefficiencies and exploitation, so any union large enough to bargain with a monopoly will end up just as bloated and corruptible. The obvious solution (as I see it) is to break the monopolies into reasonable sizes so the unions are also manageable and accountable, so capital can’t use such effective whataboutisms.
There was a house like that at a town near us that has a cafe my daughter likes to go to. A giant Trump flag, a Trump banner on both porch railings, and a “Proud Union Home” sign in the yard. Made me shake my head every time I saw it.
I’m a school bus driver and we’re all members of the Teamsters. Most of my coworkers are fanatical trumpers - in their universe it’s the GOP who are pro-union and the liberals who are trying to destroy unions (and help the illegal immigrants). A few of the most fanatical trumpers are (married) lesbians as well. Dealing with conservatives has always been a frustrating experience, but at least they used to be internally consistent with their shit. This complete disconnect from all aspects of reality seems like the one truly new part of all this.
This complete disconnect from all aspects of reality
The rules they demand are only to apply to the out-group.
They need not fear any of the rules they demand, because they are part of the in-group: Christians by self-proclamation. Trumpublicans by self-declaration. Wealthy by self-declaration. None of that even has to be true, they just have to think they are part of the in-group, and they expect none of these rules to ever bite them in the ass. That is how a man married to a black woman can try and end marriage for couples with different skin colors. That is how a lesbian can vote for people that hate lesbians. Because they think it is not about them, because they are on the “right” side. You can see the very same thing in Germany, where one of the leaders of the popular nazi party “AfD” is a lesbian.
Should they not care about others in the same situation as they are? No, because these fuckers have 0 empathy. Zero. None.
The sad part is that in the end, it will come and bite them in the ass, and they will argue that that is okay and right, as long as it bites someone else in the ass even harder. And the guys who are the real in-group, the guys with billions to their name, they are sitting their, laughing about all of us because once again, they managed to keep us underlings fighting amonst ourselves instead of making ready the guillotines.
Unfettered capitalism means people have a rough time, instead of doing a bit of introspection it’s easier to blame minorities and/or look for a guy who talks big and promises big sweeping changes
Hm, are you using that to mock the Gadsden flag in general [1], or are you using that to poke fun at the, imo, “cognitive-dissonant” mixture of the MAGA symbol and the Gadsden flag?
References
- “Portarossa” (u/Portarossa) [To: “What is the deal with the ‘No Step on Snek’ flag?”. “JeanPaulMarat” (u/JeanPaulMarat). “OutOfTheLoop” (r/OutOfTheLoop). Reddit. Published: 2021-12-31T07:13:43.360Z. Accessed: 2024-11-24T04:14Z. https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/rso5vl/what_is_the_deal_with_the_no_step_on_snek_flag/.]. Reddit. Published: 2021-12-31T08:14:00.653Z. Accessed: 2024-11-24T04:15Z. https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/rso5vl/comment/hqnrezn/.
It’s sad but that flag has lost its original meaning as a revolutionary symbol and has been fully co-opted by libertarians. So really, making fun of it in general is fine because libertarians are wackos. But especially with a Trump sticker, it’s clear they don’t understand at least one of the philosophies they stuck on their car.
[…] libertarians are wackos […]
What do you not like about libertarians?
[…] that flag has lost its original meaning as a revolutionary symbol and has been fully co-opted by libertarians. […]
Now that’s an interesting take! Why do you think that its symbolism doesn’t align with libertarianism (I assume that’s what you meant when you said “co-opted by libertarians”)?
The latter.
