The reason why this kind of article gets mocked on Hexbear is because very commonly, when China makes some kind of positive improvement, Western news articles have to attach a “BUT…” afterwards, even if the concern is extremely minor.
An achievement from China can never just stand on its own, it always has to be criticized, whereas achievements from Western nations rarely get this treatment.
whereas achievements from Western nations rarely get this treatment
I have to disagree, commercial news loves controversy and the negative, they always pull this shit, regardless of country. Even worse, what we have here is a clickbait headline that isn’t even descriptive of the article
Come on, you must see a ton of popsci articles like “This invention might end aging forever!” and “School teacher invents new green fuel” and “Why is California leading the world in [whatever]?”
Their point is that Approved countries get fluff pieces like that while China gets, from comparable material, a source of criticism that is deemed important enough to put in the headline.
Sure, US news doesn’t paint the US with a broad brush, but it does paint France, Germany, Canada, Mexico, Australia, and pretty much every other country with a broad brush. Internally, commercial media does it to US states, cities, races, religions, political parties, and more
Even worse, what we have here is a clickbait headline that isn’t even descriptive of the article
the point is that positive news out of China gets given a clickbait title that plays up the controversy while positive news from the west gets given a clickbait title that oversells the promise of the technology. why is this an observable trend in media, I wonder…
The reason why this kind of article gets mocked on Hexbear is because very commonly, when China makes some kind of positive improvement, Western news articles have to attach a “BUT…” afterwards, even if the concern is extremely minor.
The “BUT AT WHAT COST” of the thread name isn’t just a meme, it’s a common occurrence with articles about China. Here are some examples: https://twitter.com/slipknothooh/status/1433496026795630598?lang=en
An achievement from China can never just stand on its own, it always has to be criticized, whereas achievements from Western nations rarely get this treatment.
I have to disagree, commercial news loves controversy and the negative, they always pull this shit, regardless of country. Even worse, what we have here is a clickbait headline that isn’t even descriptive of the article
Come on, you must see a ton of popsci articles like “This invention might end aging forever!” and “School teacher invents new green fuel” and “Why is California leading the world in [whatever]?”
Their point is that Approved countries get fluff pieces like that while China gets, from comparable material, a source of criticism that is deemed important enough to put in the headline.
deleted by creator
Sure, US news doesn’t paint the US with a broad brush, but it does paint France, Germany, Canada, Mexico, Australia, and pretty much every other country with a broad brush. Internally, commercial media does it to US states, cities, races, religions, political parties, and more
deleted by creator
the point is that positive news out of China gets given a clickbait title that plays up the controversy while positive news from the west gets given a clickbait title that oversells the promise of the technology. why is this an observable trend in media, I wonder…