• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Seriously, there’s no standardization to the security theater hoops that the TSA forces you to jump through. Every airport is different, and the TSA guys always look so exasperated that you don’t know the routine. I guess that’s the point, that on any given day the rules might be different so that potential terrorists will have a harder time finding gaps in security, but it makes it a frustrating experience as a regular non-terrorist passenger.

  • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Last time I flew I started taking my electronics out of my carry-on (which was filled with a ridiculous amount of electronics) and a TSA agent told me to stop. I showed her inside the bag and said “you’re not gonna be able to see everything unless I take it out” and she just rolled her eyes and repeated herself. Then they had to take my bag and individually swipe everything for bomb residue because they weren’t able to see everything with the scanner…

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    One of my flying tricks is to twist tie all of my cords into one big loop so that you know you have all of your cords at once and it makes them easy to pull out and put back in as needed

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    every time I go through TSA it says “anomaly detected” at my waist and I need to be patted down. I’m trans so… correct I guess.

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There’s a good Philosophy Tube quote for this. (the presenter is a trans woman).

      Apparently the operator of the scanner has to choose if you’re a man or a woman, so “Either my tits are the bomb or there’s an unexpected item in the shagging area”

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Last time I flew I wore jeans that fit super well on the way out and kinda loose jeans that I needed a belt to keep up on the return. The loose jeans set off an anomaly in the groin area and both me and the TSA agent shared a collective “I don’t want to be doing this right now but this is what we have to do”

      Anyways my point is, I think it comes down to the fit of your clothing, if it’s more form fitting it’s less likely to be detected as an anomaly. But also the machine is sensitive enough to detect when I’ve forgotten a receipt in my back pocket and will yell about a tiny scrap of thermal paper so I suppose it would detect any anomalies in one’s body

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I mean, when the choices are either A. Put up with 30 seconds of awkward clothed patdown then move on or B. Likely be detained, not get to return home from my business trip, possibly fired for the stunt and likely have to fund my own cross country return trip through alternate travel means, there isn’t much of a choice is there?

          • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sorry, I don’t mean to blame you personally. I meant that the TSA / whole routine in an airport is pretty stupid, and people shouldn’t be attacking airplanes to make this security be the norm, and other similarly idealistic thoughts

    • themaninblack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      For this reason, and for sexual assault survivors, and for our dignity, naked photography and pat downs should not exist.

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You can opt out of the RapeScan. It doesn’t get you out of the pat down, but it’s something.

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It also wins you direct scorn by the TSAa and an attempt at public shaming “We got an opt out. OPT OUT I NEED A MANAGER! You, stand over there and wait”.

          At they very least you’re guaranteed no cellphone screencaps, fresh gloves and less radiation exposure whilst you’re stood at the machine and in the line waiting. Airports are still abysmal on privacy otherwise.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, the TSA always gives me special attention just because I have cargo shorts on and they told me that almost always triggers anomalies.

  • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I work with energetic materials in a professional capacity. I have yet to loose ny items, but I am pretty diligent in keeping plane stuff separate from work stuff.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    traveling with a baby for the first time , having laptop and having anxiety problems , travelling with multiple transfers was an awful combo.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I have pre-check, which means I get to keep belt, shoes, and jacket on. Except one random time when this butthead TSA agent insisted I remove my jacket. I fought him on it, but he was an arrogant guy. Read your own rules dumb, dumb.

    Also, they obsess over my bottle of contact solution regularly — wipe it down for bomb residue and everything, even though it is allowed. But, somehow I’ve accidentally slipped through with pocket knives and zippo lighters that were at the bottom of my bag. But, don’t you dare forget to empty your water bottle.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          The phrasing on the TSA website suggests that lighters with fluid are permitted in your carry on, just not your checked. This is also in line with the policy in Canada.

          Whether the particular TSA agent you’re stuck dealing with actually knows their guidelines, well… don’t hold your breath, they also get pissy about frozen water bottles (which also are allowed).

    • thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I use the same laptop bag for several trips a year, so I often don’t clear out all the pockets. The other day I realized I’ve been flying back and forth with a lighter I got from Vegas 2 years ago because it was buried at the bottom of a pocket. As for why the hell I had it in my laptop bag in the first place, I have no idea.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        If that was your carry-on, it probably didn’t get flagged because lighters are allowed.

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        a YouTuber I watch once had a spent bullet casing at the bottom of his bag for YEARS and tsa found it after he went on like 10 flights with it

  • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The “agents” always swear the rules are the same everywhere even though I was just in the other airport a few hours ago and no they aren’t!

    • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If the rules are the same everywhere, they would do what every other competent place that has procedures that need to be followed does, and post them at the front. The fact that a TSA bitch has to stand there and tell you what to do means they’ve already failed.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes, they are. The rule is: No matter what you do, you’ll be called a dumb bitch.

      This rule is universal and the whole point of the TSA.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They seem to relax the rules when it’s really busy… Like wait… Isn’t that when an attack would be the most dangerous meaning security would be even more important rather than less?

        Goes to show how pointless most of it is.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “This is how it’s always done, sir… on the second Tuesdays of months with an even number of days and for the full duration of Toyotathon. Now don’t make me repeat myself: laptop under the bag and over the shoes or we cavity search you.”

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Random Antiterrorism Measures

      The Random Antiterrorism Measure (RAM) program uses random, multiple security measure that change the look of an installation’s force protection program and introduce uncertainty to defeat surveillance attempts and make it difficult for a terrorist to accurately predict security actions.

      “A unit could conduct random antiterrorism measures by checking parking lots, conducting bag checks and ID cards in locations where that is not the normal security posture,” said Ann Moree, security manager, DPTMS.

      This is basically what’s going on. The theory is that by making changes to the process it will be more difficult for someone to plan a way to defeat it (not really true, as several TSA pentests have shown).

      There’s also this classic quote attributed to a German general during WWII:

      War is Chaos, and the reason why the American Army excels at War is because they practice Chaos on a daily basis.

      It may look like the front-line guys have no idea what’s going on, and that might actually be true. If they have no idea what’s going on, neither will anybody observing their activities.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think this kind of reasoning just desperately tries to find reason in insanity.

        You’re basically implying that the coordinated uncertainty is so incredibly good at being covert, that it’s absolutely indistinguishable from underpaid incompetence and power tripping pettiness.

        Maybe I’m not giving enough credit to government agencies, but actual incompetence and artisanal pettiness seem to be more likely to me than a planned behavior.

        • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Maybe it is as you say the government incompetence and the artisanal pettiness that are the planned behavior, knowing it leads to this randomization.

      • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I had not considered that. It sounds like it’s actually a sound precaution, or would be if TSA weren’t so incredibly incompetent and the threat so exaggerated.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah I’m not sure how useful it is in practice - possibly not at all - but at least some of it is intentional and not completely the result of poor management.

          I also wouldn’t be surprised if some of the apparent incompetence was intentional… but that’s just speculation.

      • kettle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It makes sense in theory to deter someone planning something sketchy. But if that’s the purpose, they should try to make it known to everyone.

        Basically, the agents should be telling everyone - “yes, the procedure can change every time”, so the potential villain scouting out the procedures would think “oh man, I thought I got it figured out, but what if tomorrow they change the rules?”

        If they instead keep insisting “you should know this, it’s the same every time”, the potential villain is more likely to feel confident in their preparation and go ahead.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That would matter if ‘screwing up’ had any bearing on the outcome, which isn’t the case because the TSA is just security theater. If they mix up the order and the result is just making you do whatever the thing is, then it is just wasted time with the same end result and security is NOT improved.

        This is just incompetence and shitty training.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, well, that’s just like, your opinion man.

          In all seriousness though, I’m not saying that RAM is effective in any measurable way. I’m saying that it’s part of the SOP and helps explain some of what people experience as apparently inconsistent behavior from the TSA.

  • Stache_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “Haha look at this asshole taking off his shoes, doesn’t he know we don’t have to do that anymore?”

    the man says while taking off his belt to prepare for the newly introduced rectal scan

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I don’t understand why they don’t have a sign at the entrance to security to tell you what to expect. Or, when it changes by which line you go to, why they don’t have a sign indicating the differences between lines.

    Instead, they wait for someone to make a mistake, then yell out their mistake like “ALL ELECTRONICS MUST COME OUT OF YOUR BAG” at the same time as someone the next line over is yelling “ELECTRONICS DO NOT NEED TO COME OUT OF YIUR BAGS”.

    TSA is infuriatingky inconsistent and incomprehensible, even for someone who travels frequently.

    • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This is due to the scanners.

      Newer scanners don’t need electronics out, older ones do.

      Unfortunately, they don’t replace them ALL at an airport at the same time, leading to inconsistency…

      My current major airport I fly through doesn’t open pre check until 9am, which is a pain, cause I have to print a paper ticket to get my precheck privileges in the normal lines

      Which causes chaos cause I don’t have to do things others do

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s not even policies changing, it seems to be based solely on the scanning hardware they have.

    Some airports have different scanners and you can leave them in the bag. Others it needs to be separate, and every electronic device has to be in a separate box.

    • AnActOfCreation@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is exactly it. Airports with the newer scanner machines (I call them the croissants due to the resemblance) let you keep your electronics in your bags.

      They still give you a hard time for not just automatically knowing that though. Every TSA line should have clearly posted rules for that line.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah I was waiting for someone to call this out.

      I think there are specific machines that can scan even with large electronics inside bags. Not all airports have them, just as not all terminals nor security lines have them.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      17 hours ago

      At some airports it varies by which line you’re in and they yell conflicting instructions within earshot of all of the lines.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Yup, flew international out of JFK in march of this year. The whole line, signs say “remove jackets, remove shoes, remove electronics from your bags”. While moving through the line, start to get everything out to be more efficient. Close to the end, I get diverted to another line with a much bigger scanner and the guy yells at me PUT YOUR ELECTRONICS BACK IN YOUR BACKPACK. LEAVE YOUR SHOES AND BELT ON.

      Like duh, I would have not gotten everything ready if there weren’t 20 signs telling me to do so.

      Flew again out of JFK internationally 3 days ago, same thing, tons of signs saying to do the same thing. This time, I’m not taking out shit, idk what they’re going to say. Sure enough, get to the actual scanner and this time I do have to take out all my electronics, shoes off, etc in the sheep herding line which would have been way faster if I had done it in line.

  • blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Had some dude in DFW act like I was both deaf and retarded when I asked him if my laptop had to be in a separate bin, lol…… it changes every time I swear

    • Plum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I got through Des Moines with a laptop in my carry-on no problem, but I got blue glove frisked in front of everyone because my bra had too many straps on the back.

        • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          As a young dude, I used to get frisked often. Now, I wonder if I could put on a wig and change my frequency. I miss the human contact.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I actually got an sarcastic “Is this your first time flying?” The last trip I went on because I didn’t take some protein bars out of my pockets.

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I wonder how often TSA agents actually fly on an airplane. This kind of work bias annoys me, like pushy car salesman trying to make spending 40k in an hour seem like no big deal. Like I understand that people do this everyday, but I don’t, so chill out a bit.

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Typical rookie mistake. What if you hyper-proteinate while inflight and then became too strong to control, like a protein hulk?

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      One time I asked while putting stuff in the buckets, then when it got to the scanner they told me the opposite.