Comrade_rose@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years agoImagine the comments if this was China? But since it's 'civilized Britain', Adults intentionally trampling kids is goodlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up163arrow-down1imageImagine the comments if this was China? But since it's 'civilized Britain', Adults intentionally trampling kids is goodlemmygrad.mlComrade_rose@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAgreeableLandscape☭@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up20·edit-22 years agoA soldier is required to oppose any illegal order. It’s in the damn Geneva convention. Strict orders is not a valid defense for anything. You know, because after WWII, every Nazi tried to save their skin by saying “we were under strict orders”?
minus-squareRatette (she/her)@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoIt would be very on brand for the Royal guard to use the nazi defence 🤣
A soldier is required to oppose any illegal order. It’s in the damn Geneva convention. Strict orders is not a valid defense for anything.
You know, because after WWII, every Nazi tried to save their skin by saying “we were under strict orders”?
It would be very on brand for the Royal guard to use the nazi defence 🤣