• Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Imperfections are what make things unique and beautiful. Be they people or manufactured items. The fact that each of those jugs is slightly different than the others (not only in size) is something that we’ve lost in our homogenised, mass produced world and it makes me sad.

  • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Cylindrical volumes have always messed with me. I understand it on a mathematical level, but practically, I am always blown away by the difference just a little bit of circumstance can make.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It‘s crazy to think that you could fill the six smaller bottles with the content of the biggest bottle and still have some leftovers.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Let’s commission a glassblower to make more bottles, each half the size of the previous one, until there are enough to store all the contents. We should negotiate a lump sum payment ahead of time, I think.

    • ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Impossible. First thing you need to do is fill the biggest botle, but to do that you have to go to the store.
      To get to the store you have to reach half the distance, and the reach half the distance remaining, and then…

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I wonder how they were fabricated. Having precise units of measure and shapes that aren’t basic demonstrates mastery of glass work. These must have been mass produced, but without machinery or automation. But how?

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Probably the same way glass is made today. Get a clay or graphite (both can withstand high temperatures, and can be shaped easily) two-part mold in the size bottle you want. Using a known quantity of glass, (you can just weigh it) you clamp the mold around it and blow it. The air forms a bubble in the glass, which becomes the inside of the bottle. And the walls of the bottle quickly cool and harden (holding the shape of the bottle) when they hit the inside of the mold and it begins sapping the heat away like a heatsink. And since it was a known quantity of glass, you know how much volume inside of the mold is taken up by glass (and inversely, you know how much is taken up by air, which determines the bottle’s volume.)

      It’s basically injection molding, but using air to fill the space instead of just injecting glass into the entire mold.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      These must have been mass produced

      Why must have they been mass produced? Couldn’t it be they’re like the equivalent of standardise weights which are used to calibrate other, less accurate measuring devices?

      So for instance perhaps these were made with extreme care, but people also had copper pots and pans with some specific size. Like, idk, 4 serving cups or something. But the way theyre made is less accurate and you can just check your bowl by filling one of these and pouring the water into your bronze bowl and seeing how it fits.

      Like perhaps taverns always serve a serving size of two cups (500ml is what we used to give as a serving in the army on every meal, as in the woods it’s always stew or mash or something else you can ladel.) and there’s a city inspector who can go around checking that taverns aren’t cheating people by having too small serving ladels of too small pints or something.

      Idk thats more of a fantasy. Probably just a set for an apothecary. And this would’ve been somewhat rare, so definitely could get your measuring sets done custom. Which you probably needed to.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apothecaries'_system

      • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sure, but I would think standardization of measurement wouldn’t mean much if it was a single person. I guess they could be selling something and perhaps have various amounts. That would seem to be a lot of work for something like that though.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well no, it’s not a single person, but more like a rare person. How many people in the modern world own calibrating weights for scales? I don’t, and I’d actually need to calibrate my scales (I just check em with several coins to get more or less a known weight. But have to do several coins so it averages out the dents and dirt the coins might have.)

          I’m just saying I don’t believe this accuracy is anything that would’ve been needed by an average citizen. So, not unique objects, but handmade specialised equipment. Probably most towns/cities would have only one or a couples of apothecaries, if any. These apothecaries on the other hand would have to get their specialised equipment either from knowing how to advice a craftsman how to make it, make it themselves, or get them from a bigger city.

          I mean you still see the exact type of bottles in pharmacies as decoration. (Well we do here. I’ve gathered US pharmacies are a bit more… commercial.)

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apothecaries'_system#Origin

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Roman_units_of_measurement

          I’m thinking they’re some of these:

          Idk how lemmy will format but the numbers after mean unit, equal to, metric, imperial and US fluid:

          acetabulum 1⁄48 congius 68 mL 2.39 fl oz 2.30 fl oz

          quartarius 1⁄24 congius 136 mL 4.79 fl oz 4.61 fl oz

          hemina or cotyla 1⁄12 congius 273 mL 9.61 fl oz 9.23 fl oz

          sextarius 1⁄6 congius 546 mL 19.22 fl oz 0.961 pt 18.47 fl oz 1.153 pt

          congius 1 congius 3.27 L 5.75 pt 0.719 gal 3.46 qt 0.864 gal

          urna 4 congii 13.1 L 2.88 gal 3.46 gal