• sinkingship
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      As far as I know valves were shut quickly. The big leak was a result of remaining gas (under pressure?) between the valves that could escape. It was a lot, as the pipes run for 100s of km under the sea, so even with valves shut there was just a lot gas in the pipe.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    What a shit article. Seriously. It’s just babble about methane and weird comparisons and not about why it would be “twice as bad” (not big) or I just gave up after 8 pages of crap.

    Why do people upvote this kind of crap?

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s written in the first two paragraphs of the article:

          The 2022 explosion and leak of the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea resulted in the release of 485,000 tonnes of methane into the atmosphere, according to a new study of the disaster.

          The methane released from the pipeline was the largest human-caused methane emissions event in history. But the magnitude of the release is twice as bad as previously thought, according to a new study conducted by the United Nations Environment Programme and published in Nature. Prior studies estimated the methane released from the disaster at between 75,000 and 230,000 tonnes.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            You’re just thinking twice as bad means twice as much, that’s just sloppy writing.

            Edit that should be “at least twice as much” too.