• Helix 🧬@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    It costs 6,800€ and you still have to change filters. This is only feasible for people who have their own janitor. And those people, incidentally, waste so much more than that bit of water.

    • electrodynamica
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      you still have to change filters

      Unless it uses a permanent filter that can be wiped clean with a biodegradable (cotton or hemp) cloth, then they are net negative on ecology and it’s not an improvement. They’re not even moving the problem so much as creating new ones. Capitalism at it’s finest.

  • homonmain@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I like this. But a way more simple and inexpensive method is to fill a bucket with water, get your soap, wash and scrub with that then wash off in the shower.

    • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Also, it’s pretty normal in plenty of places to fill a bathtub and have the entire family use the water, even keeping it for multiple days. Meanwhile the US/Canada is like “eww gross!” while a five person house over here uses literally a swimming pool’s worth of bathing water per day.

      • Amicese@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Also, it’s pretty normal in plenty of places to fill a bathtub and have the entire family use the water, even keeping it for multiple days.

        huh. Is that actually “unsanitary”, or is it just BS? I have heard some people call that ‘unsanitary’.

        Meanwhile the US/Canada is like “eww gross!” while a five person house over here uses literally a swimming pool’s worth of bathing water per day.

        Individualism at it’s finest.

        • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s obviously not as sanitary as taking individual showers, but I feel like in terms of your family, it’s less of a problem if you already live together and you’re related. If someone gets really filthy or sick or something else happens, they should probably take an individual shower, but I feel that general day to day sweat is of minimal problem, again, if you already live in the same house.

  • vitaminka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    in the summer i like to go to the local lake or river, saves 100 % of the water 🤷‍♀️

  • electrodynamica
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    🤣 it has an app! So you can play music from your (only Spotify?). Instead of just presenting itself as a Bluetooth speaker with Bluetooth track/volume control buttons. No they make a custom proprietary app, that you have to control from your phone while you are showering, I guess.

    Peak stupid design.