fossilesqueM to Science MemesEnglish · 14 hours agoAt this rate, why not.imagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1225arrow-down12
arrow-up1223arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.fossilesqueM to Science MemesEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoActually, one of their feasibility assumptions is that the device is too large to be used militarily. https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06623v1#%3A~%3Atext=Confronting+the+escalating+threat+of%2CEnhanced+Rock+Weathering+(ERW).
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoAh. I suppose building an 81 gigaton nuclear weapon wouldn’t be small. Let’s fire up the antimatter then!
Actually, one of their feasibility assumptions is that the device is too large to be used militarily.
https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06623v1#%3A~%3Atext=Confronting+the+escalating+threat+of%2CEnhanced+Rock+Weathering+(ERW).
Ah. I suppose building an 81 gigaton nuclear weapon wouldn’t be small.
Let’s fire up the antimatter then!