• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They also use more land for just about every sport and recreational activity that requires a dedicated facility.

    Unless the area is out of space, and the golf course existing is the only reason why a given wind/solar project isn’t going forward, the comparison is pretty useless.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Golf requires over 1600 square meters per player. It is a horribly inefficient use of space. They could be turned into great parks where lots of people could go, but instead only a restricted few are allowed in that area at a time.

      At the very least, kick golf courses out of cities. They can be on the outskirts.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They usually are on the outskirts. The land value alone is too high in the city.

        Also, not everything has to be about max efficiency. People enjoy golfing, so there should be somewhere for them to golf.

        • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Sure, just ban private and exclusionary clubs and give everyone the right to join and play of they wish. Then its fair.

          • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Maybe it’s a location thing, but most courses around me are open to the public. Of the private ones I know of, one is exclusively for the owners of the McMansions on the course itself, and realistically, that would just be a choice between golf course or more McMansions. In that particular case, the golf course is probably the better choice for the environment.