• @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 months ago

      Local extinction (extirpation) is a legitimate concept that is heavily studied in ecology. Just because an animal is still alive somewhere it doesn’t mean that its absence from a region it has historically lived is irrelevant.

      • @blackbrook
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        The audience for Newsweek is lay people not ecologists. It’s completely predictable that this usage of the word would create misunderstanding. Seems like misleading clickbait to me with a cover of plausible deniability.

        • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Obviously, but that doesn’t mean they don’t interview ecologists or biologists. “Extirpation” is way less layman friendly than “locally extinct,” and the article makes it extremely clear that this is an animal that hadn’t been seen in a specific region for years. Skimming the headline and deciding it means “they thought it was completely extinct” is a problem with the reader, not the headline or the term “locally extinct.”

          • @blackbrook
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            The title doesn’t say “locally extinct”. Do you really not understand how click bait titles work and why they are shitty?

            • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              You know I guess you have a point, if they’re writing for people who are too dim to realize “locally extinct” and “extinct in region” are the same concept.

    • @Tehgingey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      Yeah I thought the same. How hard would it have been to add “thought to be” behind that.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        And even then, it’s apparently still going in other areas, just “extinct” in that area.

    • @reallynotnick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      It’s a bit weird because it’s “in a region”, which begs the question if I capture a creature from a different region and move it to a region where it was extinct, is it extinct anymore? (There being only one also means it will quickly become 0 again.)

      Idk, just a weird thought.

    • @yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -19 months ago

      Well when you think the animal is extinct for over 100 years it’s generally the word you use.

      • @cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        They didn’t think that the animal was extinct for over 100 years though. There are threatened populations in QLD, NSW, tassie etc.; they just hadn’t been seen in the state of SA in 100+ years.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “The species was considered extinct in South Australia, with no official records for some 100 years or more,” National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) Limestone Coast district ranger Ross Anderson told Newsweek.

    “I expected to find a cat, but I found this little animal instead,” Pao told local news ABC South East SA.

    The quolls usually eat a wide range of prey, including lizards, snakes, poultry, small rodents, and other marsupials such as wombats and wallabies.

    “Part of the reason they’re thought to have become extinct here in the South East is due to a loss of habitat, but they can survive anywhere from forests to more open country,” Anderson told ABC.

    The quoll was caught in another trap by the NPWS on Wednesday, and the experts hope to genetically test the animal to join the dots of its origins.

    We wouldn’t recommend people try to trap them or interact with them themselves, however, but trail cameras are a really good way of recording and monitoring any suspected quoll populations or activity in the local area," Anderson said.


    The original article contains 692 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!