• dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So those people don’t deserve full protections of the constitution, privacy laws, lawyers if their stuff gets searched, and should be arrested if they don’t comply…?

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        For their place of business? No, that’s pretty clearly something they can set up within the terms of working for the state government or contracting for them.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      And how the "special oversight committee " only works for roughly half of the state government but can still cause people to be fired for not obliging to the Republican will?

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hate to say it, man, but yeah, if you piss off the state government, and you work for them, they’re gonna fire you

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          From the article:

          But unlike other types of government watchdog groups, GovOps is partisan. Republicans dominate the body, and the group’s politics greatly influence the types of investigations it carries out. For example, Gov Ops launched an inquiry into diversity training programs at the University of North Carolina earlier this year.

          Do you not understand how dangerous it is to democracy to have a partisan police force? If not then I uge you to read about the start of WW2.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every democracy has partisan oversight groups. I’ll get mad at their abuse, not their existence.

            • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Do you just enjoy playing devil’s advocate?

              Nobody of sound mind could look at this and just think “Yep, this makes sense. One party should have a secret partisan police who can victimise other political parties and force them to stay silent about it, and comply without question, otherwise be criminally charged. This definitely won’t have any wider negative implications for society.”

            • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you think republicans aren’t going to abuse a partisan police force then your concerns are void and you’re sleepwalking through life.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think it’s likely they will, and that every police force is partisan, and that they’ve been abusing that for decades.

            • bstix@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Every democracy has oversight groups, or an ombudsman. It’s not partisan

              Imagine a similar situation in a European country having several parties and one party wanting the state budget to fund their investigation of the government. That shit would never see the light of day because there’d always be a majority against it. This only exists in USA because of the two party politics.