Mander
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago

Texas ban women from using highways for abortion appointments

www.newsweek.com

external-link
message-square
44
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • news@hexbear.net
  • benjamingetthemusket@lemmy.cafe
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • brainworms@lemm.ee
  • news@lemmy.world
142
external-link

Texas ban women from using highways for abortion appointments

www.newsweek.com

Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
44
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • news@hexbear.net
  • benjamingetthemusket@lemmy.cafe
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • brainworms@lemm.ee
  • news@lemmy.world
Texas Republicans ban women from using highways for abortion appointments
www.newsweek.com
external-link
Lubbock County, Texas, becomes the next county to pass legislation banning women from using their roads to seek abortions.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.netBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 years ago

    My sister has the option of offices to work for in her next rotation. She’d been planning to move back to Houston to live near her family. However, she recently changed her mind, explicitly because - and I quote - “I want to have more children, and I can’t do that safely in Texas”.

    That’s the real ultimate consequence of this shit.

  • nightshade [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 years ago

    The same people think that public transit and walkable city design are literally 1984 because the government will use them to control where you can go.

    • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      I still firmly stand behind my policy proposal that all rugged individualists be beaten to death with a stick

    • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      They probably love this

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 years ago

    They’re going to do this for gender affirming care next, just watch

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d be amazed if they haven’t already

  • regul [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 years ago

    get ready for a 6-3 reinterpretation of the commerce clause, baybee

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    yeonmi-park In North Korea, getting healthcare is illegal, and if you’re on a highway but headed in the direction of healthcare, they throw you in jail

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    mm smell that freedom, thank god we don’t ban shit like AUTHORITARIAN CHINA

  • MorelaakIsBack [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    sick diseased parody land Texas passes new law so stupid it bends spacetime

  • red_stapler [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    Once again, I think the CIA should be arming women like the Mujahadeen in the 80s.

    • ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      These are the sorts of comments I actively look for lol

      Oh wait, this is Hexbear. Nice!

      • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 years ago

        You have entered the based-department zone.

  • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    How do you even enforce this law? Like, I know shit like this is selectively applied, but even then, like, this would be so difficult to apply. Unless they’re just going to ban pregnant people in general from driving?

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 years ago

      One must imagine this works like the “Are you a terrorist” immigration question in the US where it’s just there to punish you more severely after you got caught by whatever nightmare texas law allows someone to collect bounties by kidnapping women from abortion clinics or something

      • operacion_ogro [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yes, it will 100% be used to retroactively punish women, I doubt they set up blockades scanning for pregnant people.

    • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Pregnant women may only enter cars when it is driven by a husband or direct male relative.”

      • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t like this Lathe

    • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      Something that was brought up in the meeting I was at last night is that neighbors gonna snitch. You see your neighbor is pregnant, then you see they are no longer pregnant after a long weekend out of town, in other words. Pearl clutching ensues.

      Now realistically most people that seek abortions aren’t even showing at the time they decide to terminate the pregnancy so yeah the whole fucking thing is stupid.

      I’m no anatomy knower but I can see this backfiring on people who suffer from miscarriages after they are showing that they are carrying baby weight though since the panhandle is extremely religious and conservative.

    • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      They find out who had an abortion and then “build a case” backwards from there. Like slapping using a computer to commit a crime. Like who doesn’t use a computer to do basic tasks in society. But it’s just a punishment multiplier.

      How could it hold up in court who knows, but until that’s challenged those people remain in jail.

    • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Texas women prohibited from leaving the house without a male relative, whether pregnant or not.

    • timicin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      the law is there to add leverage for the state for when they start catching and charging people for getting abortions out of state

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s partially a chilling effect thing, partially a threat, and partially the state has very invasive surveillance.

      they’re just going to ban pregnant people in general from driving?

      No. No. Your lathe-of-heaven Lathe access is cut off!

    • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      station officers outside of abortion clinics in neighboring states looking for TX plates and have them phone APBs home

      • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        That still doesn’t prove they used the highway to get there.

        • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          you’d catch them using the highway to get back

    • bumblebeehellbringer [fae/faer, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, it would be so difficult to apply in a fair and reasonable way. Who knows what’s next? All suspected uterus-havers on house arrest in case they get pregnant? Shit’s bad. They’re also building a wall across the entire US-Mexico border. It’s not just to keep immigrants out, it’s to keep capital’s “breeding stock” in trapped in the united states. Bad things are happening and it’s going to get worse.

    • the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wouldn’t want to have an abortion appointment in the middle of a highway anyway!

    • glans [it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Too noisy

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      geordi-no back alley abortions

      geordi-yes highway abortions

      Levity aside, fuck Texas.

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    i know i shouldn’t use reddit as a serious heuristic but its easier than turning on cable news for an hour, but lately it seems like all the texas border shit & reproductive rights stuff is all being quietly swept under the rug for house speaker circuses & trump prosecution circuses.

    i mean this article isn’t even on the front page of the paper that published it. it really feels like there’s a concerted redirection from the things the dems are willing to go along with domestically (that their constituents have voted to oppose) to dog-and-pony shows in DC that don’t materially change anything

  • Parenti_stan46@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    lathe-of-heaven

    Planned Parenthood Unveils New Heat-Seeking Abortion Drone

    • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I tell ya the lathe emote at phone resolution really looks like Vince Gilligan putting a burger king crown on Will Ferrell

  • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Soon: “Texas bans women from driving within 100 miles of an abortion clinic”

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    Eventually the GOP justices on the supreme court will issue a “surprising” ruling that somehow makes this sort of clearly unconstitutional stuff legal.

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don’t post low-hanging fruit here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 697 users / day
  • 1.66K users / week
  • 2.72K users / month
  • 5.24K users / 6 months
  • 15 local subscribers
  • 13.8K subscribers
  • 20.5K Posts
  • 304K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • ZoomeristLeninist [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • sweet_pecan [love/loves, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • khizuo [ze/zir]@hexbear.net
  • gaystyleJoker [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • Sulvy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org