• Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you seem to think a ‘colonial’ standard of measurement is bad because it was imposed by force (metric wasn’t in the vast majority of metric countries btw), the ‘indigenous’ one would need to be meaningfully different. but old measuring standards were arbitrary impositions from old ruling classes

      • CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        old measuring standards were arbitrary impositions from old ruling classes

        As opposed to metric, which was an arbitrary imposition by the French ruling class.

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          how is that worse? if you’re going to argue this is a knock against metric, the ‘french ruling class’ needs to be worse than whichever royal nonce decided the length of an ell.

          btw when did the french conquer south america? it’s so weird they’re all using metric but i can’t remember the date when Napoleon came round and forced them all to switch

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              gold reading comprehension star for you ⭐ you’ve successfully arrived at my point but you seem to think its yours.

              i’m equivocating between the imposition of measurement systems through coercive force and arguing it is not a valid complaint against metric—so you agree?