• pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just think it’s weird to call it an election when it sounds like the only option available is ever “yes”.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I can’t wrap my head around how you consider this a real election when the National Candidacy Commission has absolute and unconditional veto power over all candidates.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          The same way you consider elections to be real in your country. Sanders had huge public support and championed policies that were popular with vast majority of Americans. Yet, the candidate that represents the oligarchs is now the president.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Bernie Sanders never had massive public support. He had enthusiastic support from a minority. In 2016, he benefited from many primary voters not particularly liking Clinton and the feeling that the primary was more of a coronation than a contest. Fast forward to 2020 and Joe Biden got around double the votes that Sanders did. There was a brief period of time where the more mainstream candidates were splitting that vote giving Sanders a phantom lead, but that disappeared the moment the other mainstream candidates dropped out. And that’s just in the Democratic primary. In a larger election with centrist and right leaning voters, politicians like him have no chance of being elected unless the political climate changes significantly. That’s not coming from some oligarchy boogieman. That’s the genuine beliefs of the proletarian making their way into the ballot box.

            In terms of individual policies, polling on those are (1) notoriously tricky to poll and (2) don’t necessarily translate well to elections. Take government-provided health care. If you ask if the government should be responsible for providing health care, you will usually get a healthy majority. But if you tweak it to also ask about increasing taxes, that majority disappears. Never mind that government-provided health care be the same thing, just with the money taking a different route.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Vast majority of people want things like affordable healthcare, loan forgiveness, higher pay, and better social security. Every single poll shows this. The notion that you have to raise taxes on people with low income is just a fiction. The taxes Sanders proposed were taxes on high income earners that would’ve affected a tiny rich minority.

              Meanwhile, things like public healthcare aren’t a theoretical question. There is tangible evidence from plenty of other countries, including Canada right next door. US has far worse outcomes and people in US pay far more per capita. The fact that this is a debate in US shows just how much public discourse has been subverted by special interests.

              The reality is that the ideas that Sanders championed are sensible, have been implemented with great success in many western countries, and have broad support from US public. Yet, despite that, people of US got more of the same. Yet, you think you live in a democracy while people in Cuba who have a government working in their interest live in a dictatorship. This is your brain on American propaganda.

              • pingveno@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’m not arguing against Bernie Sanders and his ideas. I’m pointing out that him not getting elected is, for better or for worse, exactly what the citizens of the US want.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  And I’m pointing out that the only candidate that had broadly popular ideas had no path to victory in your supposedly democratic system. Your current president sits at 38% approval rating and has dipped as low as 36% earlier. Calling this a democracy is a farce.

                  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    You keep saying that Bernie Sanders is wildly popular and should have won. Please cite a poll that clearly demonstrates that Bernie Sanders has majority support among citizens as a whole and would win in a free and fair election.

    • Dochyo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      You might gain some insight if you were to actually study the substance of the election instead of making generalizations and assumptions.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I started poking around. While it’s clear that citizens have some say, ultimately any dissenting opinions appear to be filtered out by the Communist Party.