Me, making memes only my PhD advisor will understand:
Biology majors right now thinking to themselves, “sure, this seems funny.”
Primitive. It doesn’t even resolve the dimensionality with a recursive holographic topology and completely ignores gravity as a dispersion of sum total energy across the surface defined by the boundaries between permutative waveforms.
Ooga booga, string go brrr.
The only Lagrangian action grandpa is going to see is my 4’ vertical after I dunk on his dusty ass.
The older Erik Per Sullivan gets the more amusing I find this meme.
So you don’t need to look, he’s 32.
Superstrings of past’s future.
I have no idea what any of this means. Assuming that it is related to string theory.
Is this in reference to a real theory? If so, you have my attention.
Depends on what you mean by “real”. As in " corresponds to physical reality", no. As in “a real model which people are researching”, yes.
I never mean the first one when discussing math.
Hold on let me dust off my vx rig to try this out
In reality the question is a cultural contrast of androgynous terms with respect to the Lagrangian quantum field casuistry orientation. Perhaps exogenous parameters should be considered with respect to Socratic philosophy, at least with respect to the genesis of this question from a position of initiation of ancient thought. I do not believe that quantum telluric hermeneutics transverts the anothertic peripatetics of archaic philosophy for the factual iniquity of non-dogmatic BS dialogues.
I do not want to finish my contribution to your interesting meme without recommending the book: “The sidereal feeling of past constellations”, there we delve deeper into the quantum philosophy applied to the uniqueness of the Spanish chickpea, perhaps it will be of interest to you…
Save it for the C-Z Polis, citizen. I don’t have the shaper to emit tags for a gestalt like this.
I like thinking that ala of universe is just information.
What does this mean in simple terms
Lagrangian quantum field theory is much better fight me
