• Cap@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The 1970 act explicitly protected “fish,” which were initially defined as invertebrates. And because the act has protected snails and other invertebrates that live on land since, Tuesday’s ruling said it interpreted the legislation to also include bees.

    I’d link to the article but it’s a nightmare.

    • Mothra
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ohhh I see so they initially defined fish as invertebrates. Got it.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        To clarify, though, we do not need scientists to tell lawmakers that bees are not fish. We need scientists to tell lawmakers not to put conservation laws into effect that only cover fish, and then not publish any new ones so we have to keep expanding that one by reclassifying more and more things as fish.

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        US also passed something stated that pizza is a vegetable, for the purposes of providing kids nutrients in school. They based that result in the fact that pizza has tomatoes in the sauce. Nevermind tomatoes are a fruit.

        The people that make the rules that govern our lives have a disconnect with us.

        • Hotdog Salesman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Vegetables don’t exist, they’re just edible plants. It’s a superset that contains fruits, leaves, stems, flowers geophytes and many more reeeeeeeee