• BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    One monkey may never produce it even given infinite time. It could just produce an infinite string of the letter a and never change it’s mind. That’s less likely that it writing hamlet, or even many hamlets… But nonetheless, it could. In fact all of the infinite monkeys could do that. If you repeated the experiment and infinite number of times, it’s likely that one of them will simple produce an infinite number of infinite strings of only the letter A. Or, idk, ASCII art.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the same type of criticism the paper made. The real intent behind the saying is given random output (where all outputs have nonzero probability) eventually you will create anything/everything.

      Its a thought experiment around infinity, probability, and art.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I haven’t read whatever paper this is talking about, but I imagine, it’s looking at the saying in a more literal fashion for the sake of argument…

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s why a monkey is used in the thought experiment. Monkeys do think at a low level. As it goes insane over centuries of imprisonment in front of its jailer, it’s likely going to try complex solutions to get out. Think of the hell infinity would really be for this monkey.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, and given infinite monkeys no doubt they will eventually evolve into something that allows them to escape!