• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Reminds me of the meme using the Donnie Darko psychologist template.

    Donnie: I made a new form of power generation.

    Psychologist: New or steam?

    Donnie: Steam…

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Steam implies water! What if we used some OTHER phase-change working fluid? :D

      ||(No idea what, though. my question is implied with a playful tone and is at least 50% facetious; any actual discussion that might result would be little more than a pleasant coincidence)||

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You want to see weird water look up super critical boilers. That stuff was nasty. A regular steam leak will set things on fire. That stuff would explode a broom. We looked for the leaks with straw brooms. You can’t see steam in normal conditions. Only its effects.

        • Benjaben@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Blech, I’ve heard stories in my industrial automation days of people being clipped by invisible high pressure steam leaks. No frickin thank you, regular stovetop steam jacks me up frequently enough.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Molten salt?

        We can then use compressed CO2 in the place of steam to drive the turbine.

    • hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      More like a steam turbine (which is way cooler cause it’s like a jet engine). Steam engine makes me think of a piston engine like on a train.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      We discovered a banger like 400 years ago and have held on tight until eight about now with wind/solar/hydro.

      Still going to be using them geothermal/fission/fusion for at least another 100 years though.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The only really new kinds are thermocouples (mostly garbage) and solar panels (poor efficiency, but abundant fuel).

          Some fusion might end up using magnet pumping, which is basically just a plasma powered piston.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            The best solar panels are getting at or above the efficiency of converting nuclear heat to electricity (about 1/3) so they probably shouldn’t get that poor efficiency label.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Don’t skip the betavoltaic battery, (or the brand-name: Betacel), which turns beta-radiation directly into electricity. They used them in the 70s to power pacemakers, since batteries were kinda shit back then, and implanting Prometium into people is just too epic not to do.

            Nowadays we have tritium-decay betavoltaic batteries, on satellites, buried or underwater sensors and probably some too secret military stuff.

            • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              57 minutes ago

              Ooo, good call.

              There’s also radioisotope piezoelectric generators, where the electrons are caught by a cantilever and then released in regular pulses. An electron waterwheel if you will.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nearly all power generation comes down to boiling water to steam which spins a turbine.

    I can only think of two common exceptions off the top of my head. Solar is an exception and Hydro power is an exception ironically, that usually uses the vertical difference and gravity to spin the turbine.

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      One could even argue that hydro power is just boiling water, letting it condense, and then letting it spin a turbine

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        I’ve never heard of Hydro power boiling water. Usually hydro power is natural or pumped storage.

        You’re just taking water from an upper reservoir and dropping it to a downstream river. Either a naturally-filled reservoir/lake, or a pumped storage reservoir where you use other cheap power during low usage periods to pump that water to a higher reservoir to utilize later. The pump doesn’t heat the water, it just moves it uphill to utilize later, like the Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station in Missouri.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, who would have guessed that modernity was invented by someone who stuck magnets to a fidget spinner and strapped it to a boiler.

    • usrtrv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Wind? And binary cycle geothermal plants but not sure how common they are.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nuclear power is the refining distilling and enriching of uranium into unstable isotopes and higher elements, boiling water is one small step in converting nuclear energy into electrical energy.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But it’s one of the most important steps because it’s where the actual electricity comes from.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      into unstable isotopes

      No, they were there all along.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Sheng Wang is hilarious! Seriously, if you like comedy then watch his stuff

  • unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I heard that somewhere in the US there were parts of a nuclear power plant being delivered by steam train. So that’s basically one steam engine supplying another! (^^,)

    I can’t seem to find an article about it anywhere, so it might be an urban legend :(

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Given that the first commercial nuclear power plants in the US were coming online in the late 1950s, that’s entirely possible. Steam trains were well on their way out by then, but there were still a few hauling freight around.

      Fun adjacent fact: even when the British Empire had moved off of wind sails and into coal, those coal ships didn’t have the range to possibly cover the entire Empire. Coal stations were setup around the world, and the coal had to be transported by sail. The previous technology helps get the next generation technology going.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sail ships continued to be used well into the 20th century. The absolute last purely sail powered warship served during WW1!