I was on stable diffusion art and one of my comments got removed for saying the OP didn’t “make” the AI generated art. But he didn’t make shit the AI made it, he typed in a description and hit enter. I think we need a new word for when someone shared art an AI made, like they generated it or something. It feels insulting to actual artists to say you made art with AI

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    So there is this feature where you can focus the AI on a specific file when generating responses. If that file contains only your own digital art, is the AI art produced yours? Not saying that’s what you found, but maybe there is some nuance to AI art creation.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Prompted it is the best one I’ve heard, as crafting the right prompt is something of a skill on its own.

    They didn’t make it, they prompted the AI to make it.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is how art has worked for millennia.

      I go to a human artist and say “please make me a painting of my family. Make my wife more beautiful, me more tall, and my kids not look like little shits.” And then you give money. That’s a prompt for a commissioned work.

      No one ever praises the Duke of Milan for commissioning a painting of The Last Supper. They praise Leonardo Friggin’ di Vinci for making it.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Honestly, these are both simplistic takes. Tools are tools are tools, so for better and worse there is a big gradient across “popped up a genAI and asked for an image with a prompt”>“asked a genAI for an image and then asked for changes”>“asked a gen AI for an image and then fine tuned it and tweaked it in parts to the point where, let’s be honest, this would have been faster to do in Photoshop from scratch” (which is a thing and it baffles me a little)>“made an image using some genAI content in the process”.

      It’s a bit of a mess, and a good reason why to be safe for production and commercial use a lot of pro content creation places just ban the technology outright to avoid legal issues later. That’s a good call.

      If you want to draw a line for amateur image sharing… I don’t know, it gets weird and complicated.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Well it’s like you commission a work when you use AI. Do this, more like that, bluer, smaller etc. So not creating art IMO.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          there’s also sometimes deeper collaboration with image generation, where you edit the result in like krita and then send it through the generator again to smooth out the edges of the touch-ups.

          i occasionally do work where i cut up existing images to make new ones, like making a person in a particular pose by pulling an head from one image, a torso from another, an arm and background features from a third etc, then i would painstakingly color match and blend it all together with hours of filter, clone brush and single-pixel edit work. with image generation i can get a blending and lighting pass for my image in a few seconds. it’s not perfect but the speed makes the work a lot easier.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 minutes ago

            Seems like it would be buch easier to take up drawing and painting 😁

            Jk, to each their own artistic process.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People who ask for art didn’t do the art. Wretch, you have merely stated a request. Worse, you have spoken your desires to a demon, and now you proudly display its gift as your own work.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How wonderful, another AI thread on .world, a feast for my blocklist.

    The block button hungers for the luddite with no basic reasoning skills.

    • Luddites were right. They opposed the use of certain types of automated machinery due to concerns relating to worker pay and output quality.

      This is not the dunk you think it is. Of course you’re a moron who likes AI slop so there’s not much in the way of thinking.

      Just regurgitating a word you heard without understanding where it comes from. In a way you’re worse than AI model.

  • tryagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Slopper.

    “Wow this guy’s portraits are really good!”

    “Nah he’s just a slopper”

  • DasKibby@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That painter didn’t make the painting, the brush did, he just dunked it into some color and pushed it around. Probably didn’t even grind his own pigment…