- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.world
Or… they’re all propaganda machines for someone.
Americans when China banned their social media:
China is banning our amazing free speech platforms. Censorship! Look at our free speech!
Americans now:
We need to censor social media! Chinese propaganda cannot be allowed to spread! This is a security risk! America must own every social media platform!
No US social media site would ever be a thinly-concealed arm of state propaganda…
Last panel almost has you thinking it’s not all corpo social media.
Bummed that it came across that way because I absolutely do not feel like that.
That’s right, Americans should only use US government approved domestic spyware/propaganda platforms. Get rekt lmao. 🤡
This comic is propaganda and misinformation.
Biden has my wife and kids locked up in a political prison, if I don’t spread anti china propaganda via memes on my lemmy instance, he’s going to kill them
Show us how it’s not Chinese spyware
Show us how it is.
That’s easy. But the comment OP is probably a tanky anyway and will deny or rationalize all evidence.
Funny name for someone whos actually glowing. Tell the alphabet boys to kick rocks.
🤡
It’s not that it isn’t spyware, it’s that all social media is. If the US had a problem with spyware, they would make a sweeping laws about spyware. Not just target one platform. This is racism pure and simple.
Ok, but that has nothing to do with the comment OP’s comment. I agree with what you said up until the last sentence. Racism? Lmfao. So the Biden admin are all racists too? It has nothing to do with race. No nation-state is going to let another nation-state spy on their own citizens. Race has nothing to do with it.
We already had in place Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act, and the American Data Privacy and Protection Act. These acts prevent companies from giving US consumer data to foreign adversaries. Why did we make another law specifically naming tiktok?
Also, this is a fun watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8dctPC3c4A
OMG he literally said the thing! Cringey as hell.
spy on american citizens
BTW is there any actual proof tiktok is doing what the above US companies are? And not just some vague orientalism from anglophone media sources?
Also lets not pretend a US tiktok ban has anything to do with security or privacy. It’s about being unable to silence pro-palestine views, which they’re able to do only on the US-run platforms.
No on spies on our citizens except for us!
True, but when the US projects the crimes it commits against the world onto its enemies, we need to see actual evidence.
Yes, has there been a lack of evidence for the Palestinian genocide?
The TikTok ban is something Mark Zuckerberg lobbied for. It’s not a good thing.
Yeah, just the Chinese aps do that shit. Regular Western apps always protect your data and would never misuse it in any way.
They want the Chinese to buy it from them! /s
I don’t understand why the response isn’t just stronger privacy laws on this.
- Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR): TikTok Law Is an Attempt to Censor, Not a Warning to Big Tech (Emphasis original)
[NYT’s Cecilia] Kang’s thesis [link] was premised on years’ worth of media and policymaker fearmongering that TikTok user data was susceptible to surveillance by the Chinese government (BuzzFeed News, 6/17/22; Forbes, 10/20/22; Guardian, 11/7/22). According to Kang’s colleagues, the law’s enactment was prompted by “concerns that the Chinese government could access sensitive user data” (New York Times, 4/26/24). In 2023, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte sought to prohibit TikTok throughout his state on the grounds that “the Chinese Communist Party” was “collecting US users’ personal, private and sensitive information” (Montana Free Press, 5/17/23). (Gianforte’s attempt was later thwarted by a federal judge.)
If such fears were officials’ genuine motivation, one could hope that broader data-privacy regulation might follow. Yet, as the Times neglected to mention, the spying accusations are tenuous—and deeply cynical. As even US intelligence officials concede, apprehensions about China’s access to TikTok user data are strictly hypothetical (Intercept, 3/16/24). And, despite its bombshell headline “Analysis: There Is Now Some Public Evidence That China Viewed TikTok Data,” CNN (6/8/23) cautioned that said evidence—a sworn statement from a former ByteDance employee—“remains rather thin.”
Given their dubious nature, it’s hard to see these data-privacy claims as anything other than a pretext for the US to throttle TikTok. By forcing either divestment or a ban, the US, at least in theory, wins: It transfers a tremendously lucrative and influential company into its own hands, or it prevents that company from serving as a platform—albeit one with plenty of problems—on which people can engage in and learn from discourses that are critical of US empire.
- CNN, 2022: TikTok moves US users’ data to Oracle servers to address security concerns
- US private equity firms own more of TikTok than anyone. WSJ: What Is TikTok Worth? Some Say $20 Billion, Others Say $100 Billion. The CEO is Singaporean, Shou Zi Chew, and the VP is American, Michael Beckerman.
- [Mitt] Romney Admits Push to Ban TikTok Is Aimed at Censoring News Out of Gaza
“Some wonder why there was such overwhelming support for us to shut down, potentially, TikTok or other entities of that nature,” said Romney. “If you look at the postings on TikTok and the number of mentions of Palestinians relative to other social media sites, it’s overwhelmingly so among TikTok broadcasts.”
- Paris Marx: The TikTok ban is all about preserving US power The platform isn’t a national security threat, but a challenge to Silicon Valley’s dominance
I point none of this out to defend TikTok as some beacon of hope: it’s just another corporate social media platform. I don’t have a TikTok account and don’t use it.
- Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR): TikTok Law Is an Attempt to Censor, Not a Warning to Big Tech (Emphasis original)
People love to shit on TikTok, but honestly, I really enjoy it. It’s not for everyone, and that’s okay. Short-form content can be a lot—for me too. It took me a while to hone my algorithm and wade through stuff I didn’t like. But TikTok stands out compared to Instagram Reels or YouTube Shorts. The content feels more authentic and engaging. When I scroll through TikTok, I often feel like I’m learning something new or having my perspective challenged.
TikTok’s algorithm doesn’t completely suppress leftist views. It’s one of the few platforms where conversations about issues like the genocide in Palestine actually gain traction. Of course, it’s a corporate platform, and it’s far from perfect. It has its alt-right pipelines and played a role in Trump winning this election because it was popular, and his team utilized it. But let’s not pretend that’s unique to TikTok—all social media platforms are allowing and often skewing towards the alt-right.
And then there’s the whole “TikTok is Chinese spyware” narrative, which just feels like a distraction. If we’re worried about surveillance, let’s not ignore how U.S.-based platforms are also spying on us—for corporations and the government alike. Singling out TikTok for being Chinese misses the bigger picture entirely. This ban is happening because Meta and others don’t want competition.
I don’t remember much political shit with vine. Just silly videos that didn’t reek of trying to game the algorithm to make money. It makes me think of how tablets failed originally but then apple made them and everyone wanted to pay to lick the turtleneck guy’s asshole.
“Push propaganda” [citation needed]
deleted by creator
- Wikipedia isn’t a citation.
- What does that random dude have to do with anything?
The winner of 22.94% of the votes in the 2024 Romanian election, Calin Georgescu, is a far-right candidate that said that a fascist dictator is a national hero
His place as the person who got most votes came as a surprise to many romanians, which barely heard of him. His advertising was mostly done through TikTok. The election was canceled because of claims that his growth was unnatural
The 2024 election was also the first election this century where the political party PSD hasnt gotten in the top 2
TikTok played a huge role in the popularity of a pro-fascist, pro-russian, anti-EU independent candidate
Source: i live in Romania
So they just threw out the results of a free and fair election because one candidate was just too good at social media campaigning? Democracy ftw
As far as i know, the election was delayed to figure out if he would be disqualified for not respecting the constitution
We’ve already banned Tiktok and 50+ other apps after a border clash.
When will our country start our own mainstream social media networks and get to ban Fb, Insta & X(Formally known as Twitter) which are USAmerican companies that push USAmerican propaganda and spies on Indian citizens?
Where’s Saint Peter pulling the lever to send it to hell?